TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Sanjay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J —Aggrieved by the judgments of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Theog, on 14.08.2007/25.08.2007 and affirmed by the learned Sessions Judge, Shimla, on 13.02.2008, the petitioner has filed the instant revision petition under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ''Code'') .
2. On a complaint having been filed by the Food Inspector, the petitioner was tried for an offence punishable under Section 16(1) (a) (i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short ''Act'') . It was alleged therein that on 11.11.2005 at about 10.30 a.m., the Food Inspector/Complainant (for short ''Complainant'') inspected the shop of the petitioner i.e. shop ''M/s Sood Brothers, Chhailla'' and found the petitioner conducting the business of the shop as a proprietor thereof. He was having 4x500 grams poly packs of ''Gupta Special Agra Petha'' on counter kept for sale to the general public. It was thereafter averred that the complainant after disclosing his identity issued notice, declaring his intention to take sample of ''Petha'' for the purpose of analysis. Thereafter, the complainant purchased 3x500 g
Amur Chand Agrawal Vs. Shanti Bose and another
Bansi Lal and others Vs. Laxman Singh
Chinnaswami Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Kaptan Singh and others Vs. State of M. P. and another
Mahendra Pratap Vs. Sarju Singh
P. N. G. Raju Vs. B. P. Appadu
Pathumma and another Vs. Muhammad
Ramu @ Ram Kumar Vs. Jagannath
Ramu alias Ram Kumar and others Vs. Jagannath
State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Rajagopala Rao
State of Karnataka Vs. Appu Balu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.