TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Lochan – Appellant
Versus
Rajinder Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. - Cr.Mp(M) No. 1416 of 2018
By medium of this application, the applicant/petitioner has sought condonation of delay of 412 days, which has crept up in filing of the revision petition. For the reasons so assigned and set-out in the application, the same is allowed and the delay in filing of the revision is condoned. Application stands disposed of.
Criminal Revision be registered.
Cr. Revision No. 416 of 2018
2. The petitioner has been convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months and to pay a sum of Rs.5,50,000/- as compensation to the complainantrespondent for an offence having been committed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act(for short the ''Act'') by the learned trial Magistrate on 31.3.2016/01.04.2016., which conviction and sentence was upheld by the learned Sessions Judge, Mandi on 08.09.2017, constraining him to file the present revision petition.
3. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that in the month of August, 2009 the petitioner borrowed Rs.6,00,000/- from the respondent for purchase of Maxi Cab bearing registration No. HP-01A-0345 with a promise to pay every instalment of finance
Amur Chand Agrawal vs. Shanti Bose and another
Bansi Lal and others vs. Laxman Singh
Chinnaswami vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Kaptan Singh and others vs. State of M.P. and another
Mahendra Pratap vs. Sarju Singh
Pathumma and another vs. Muhammad
Ramu @ Ram Kumar vs. Jagannath
Ramu alias Ram Kumar and others vs. Jagannath
State of A.P. vs. Rajagopala Rao
State of Karnataka vs. Appu Balu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.