CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Vicky Sohal – Appellant
Versus
Diksha Devi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J. - The present petition is maintained by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as "the Code") for quashing of F.I.R No. 196 of 2019 dated 28.8.2019, under Sections 376 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station, Shimla West, District Shimla, H.P.
2. Briefly stating the facts, giving rise to the present petition, as per the prosecution story, are that on 11th July, 2014, petitioner took respondent No.1 in his Maruti Car to an isolated place, where he forcibly committed sexual intercourse with her. When, respondent No.1 started weeping, the petitioner promised to marry her. Thereafter, the petitioner repeatedly developed physical relations with her. After the completion of graduation by respondent No.1, she started taking coaching and taken on rent a room at Tutu. The petitioner started regularly visiting the house of respondent No.1, especially when she was all alone. During this period, respondent No.1 also became pregnant on one or two occasions, but the pregnancy was to be aborted. On 26.8.2019, respondent No.1 came to know that the petitioner has been engaged to a girl
B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another Vs. State of Uttaranchal and Others
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and others Vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and another Vs. Special Judicial Magistrate and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.