TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Babu Ram – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Pradesh University – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
1. The instant petition has been filed for grant of following substantive reliefs:
(ii) Order dated 27.2.2020 (Annexure P5) passed by Disciplinary Authority (Executive Council, H.P. University) concurring with the enquiry report Annexure P3 and awarding punishment of dismissal from service against the petitioner may kindly be quashed and set aside.”
2. The petitioner, while being posted at Enquiry Section/Sale Counter with the assignment to sell prospectus of ICEDOL, was issued memorandum of charge sheet under Rule 14 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965. After completion of inquiry, a copy of inquiry report was delivered to the petitioner on 20.12.2019, wherein he was indicted for different charges.
3. The petitioner submitted a detailed representation against inquiry report to the Disciplinary Authority, however the Disciplinary Authority rejected the representation on 27.2.2020 by passing the following order
Ravi Yashwant Bhoir Vs. District Collector
Shrilekha Vidyarthi Vs. U.P. (1991) 1 SCC 212
LIC Vs. Consumer Education and Research Centre (1995) 5 SCC 482
Union of India Vs. Mohan Lal Capoor (1973) 2 SCC 836
Mahesh Chandra Vs. U.P. Financial Corpn.(1993) 2 SCC 279
S.N. Mukherjee Vs. Union of India(1990) 4 SCC 594
Krishna Swami Vs. Union of India (1992) 4 SCC 605
Sant Lal Gupta Vs. Modern Coop. Group Housing Society Ltd.(2010) 13 SCC 336
Ram Chander vs. Union of India
Roop Singh Negi vs. Punjab National Bank & anr.
Chairman, Disciplinary Authority, Rani Lakshmi Bai Kshetriya Gramin Bank vs. Jagdish Sharan Varshney
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.