CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Pradeep Kumar Dhameeja – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA, J.
1. The instant petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as “the Code”), has been maintained by the petitioner for quashing of F.I.R No. 21 of 2021, dated 27.1.2021, under Sections 279 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter to be called as “IPC”), registered at Police Station Sadar Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., alongwith all consequent proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R., pending before the learned trial Court.
2. Briefly stating the facts, giving rise to the present petition, as per the prosecution story, are that on 27.1.2021, at about 3:30 p.m, petitioner drove a vehicle bearing registration No.UK-07BQ-9804 near Hotel Holiday Home, Shimla, in a rash and negligent manner so as to endanger human life and personal safety of others, struck against a vehicle bearing registration No.HP-01A-5467, as a result of which, respondent No.2, received simple injuries. Pursuant thereto, statement of respondent No.2 came to the Police Station for lodging FIR against the petitioner. Now, respondent No.2 entered into a compromise, on the basis of receipt Annexure P-1, dated 6th February, 2021, stated
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and others vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another v. State of Uttaranchal & Others
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and another
Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand and another
B.S. Joshi and others vs. State of Haryana and another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others (1998) 5 SCC 749
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.