CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Anshul Koundal – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge
The instant petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as “the Code”), has been maintained by the petitioner for quashing of F.I.R No. 80 of 2018, dated 4.4.2018, under Sections 279 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter to be called as “IPC”), registered at Police Station, Boileauganj (Shimla West), District Shimla, H.P., alongwith all consequent proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R., pending before the learned trial Court.
2. Briefly stating the facts, giving rise to the present petition, as per the prosecution story, are that respondent No.2-Joginder Kumar, made a statement, under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, before the police, alleging therein that he is a resident of Village Jadla (Kakkarhatti), Post Office Subathu, Tehsil Kasasuli, District Solan, H.P and working as a Driver, in a vehicle bearing registration No.HP-64-7158. On 4.4.2018, at about 2:35 p.m, petitioner drove a motorcycle bearing registration No.HP37D-4347 near Summerhill Boileauganj chowk, in a rash and negligent manner so as to endanger human life and personal safety of others and struck against a
B.S. Joshi and others vs. State of Haryana and another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others ((1998) 5 SCC 749)
Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand and another
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another v. State of Uttaranchal & Others
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and others vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.