CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Rupinder Karwasra – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J.
The present petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been maintained by the petitioner for quashing of F.I.R No. 48 of 2020, dated 05.11.2020, under Section 376 IPC, registered at Women Police Station Baddi, District Solan, H.P., alongwith all consequent proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R..
2. Tersely, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that on 05.11.2020 the prosecutrix made a complaint to the police, wherein she stated that for the last three years she is residing with Rupinder Karwasra (petitioner herein), who on the pretext of marriage, committed sexual intercourse with her on many times and when she asked him to marry her, he refused. Upon the complaint, so made by the complainant, police registered F.I.R No. 48 of 2020, dated 05.11.2020, under Section 376 IPC, at Women Police Station Baddi, District Solan, H.P., and the investigation ensued. During the course of investigation, police arrested the petitioner and all the codal formalities were completed. However, now the parties have arrived at a compromise and to this effect affidavits, Annexures P-2 and P-3 have been filed alongwith the insta
B.S. Joshi and othersvs. State of Haryana and another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others
Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand and another
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another v. State of Uttaranchal & Others
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and othersvs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.