SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 244

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Satyen Vaidya, J.
HPSEB Supervisory Accounts Services Association, Through Its President, Sh. H.S. Garg, Assistant Accounts Officer - Petitioners
Versus
H.P. State Electricity Board, Through Its Secretary - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition Original Application No. 3782 of 2019
Decided On : 27-08-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Sunita Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhananjay Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Ruma Kaushik, Advocate

Point of Law : The concept of equal opportunity undoubtedly permeates the whole spectrum of an individual's employment from appointment through promotion and termination to the payment of gratuity and pension. But the concept of equality has an inherent limitation arising from the very nature of the constitutional guarantee. Equality is for equals.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 16 and 14 - Termination to the payment of gratuity and pension - State Electricity Board - Board introduced a Scheme for benefit of Time Bound Promotional Scales - Benefit of TBPS was to be made available only when employee did next higher post before the requisite period of 9 or 16 years as the case - Superintendents (NG) to the effect that those who wanted to opt for initial scale would be entitled for the benefits of TBPS and those who opted for improved pay scale - Matter relating to above noted discrimination was with Board.

Finding of the Court : Fraught with the danger that it may produce artificial inequalities and therefore, the right to classify is hedged in with salient restraints - guarantee of equality will be submerged in class legislation masquerading as laws meant to govern well-marked classes characterized by different and distinct attainments - Must be truly founded on substantial differences which distinguish persons grouped together from those left out of the group and such differential attributes must bear a just and rational relation to the object sought to be achieved - Representation of petitioner having been passed during the pendency of petition has to abide by the final outcome of the petition.

Result : Petition is allowed

ORDER :

Satyen Vaidya, J.

By way of instant petition, following substantive reliefs have been prayed:

    (i) That the impugned Annexure A-14, dated 3.7.2001 may be quashed and set-aside.

(ii) That the respondent Board may be directed to grant the members of the applicant Association the Time Bound Promotional Scales on completion of 9/16 years of service from the date of their joining the induction post of SAS Superintendents (NG) with all consequential benefits and to pay arrears along with interest @ 18% per annum.

2. Petitioner No.1 is an Association (for short, “Association”) of Supervisory Accounts Services officers working with H.P. State Electricity Board Ltd. (for short ‘Board’).

3. On 14.11.1990, the Board vide office order No.80, revised the scales of pay to certain categories of its employees w.e.f. 01.01.1986. SAS Superintendents (NG) were placed in the pay scale of Rs.2000 – 3500 with initial start of Rs.2100/-.

4. On 31.01.1991, the Board introduced a Scheme providing for the benefit of Time Bound Promotional Scales (for short, ‘TBPS’) to its employees after completion of 9/16 years of regular service in the Board having a maximum scale upto Rs.3500/-. On 20.5.1992, the SAS Superintendents (NG) were also declared eligible for the benefit of TBPS. Accordingly, the SAS Superintendents (NG) became entitled for pay scale of Rs.2400-4250 after 9 years and Rs.3000-4500 after 16 years. Needless to say, that the benefit of TBPS was to be made available only when the employee did not get promoted to the next higher post before the requisite period of 9 or 16 years as the case may be.

5. The Board, vide office order No.1 dated 05.01.1995 revised the pay scale of SAS Superintendents (NG) to Rs.2100-3700 w.e.f. 01.01.1986. On 12.5.1995 the benefit of TBPS granted to SAS Superintendents (NG) was ordered to be withdrawn by the Board with immediate effect.

6. The posts of SAS Superintendents (NG) in the Board were re-designated as Assistant Accounts Officers in the pay scale of Rs.2200-4000 plus Rs.200/- as special pay, vide office order dated 6.6.1996.

7. On 04.12.1996, the Board sought options from SAS Superintendents (NG) to the effect that those who wanted to opt for the initial scale of Rs.2000-3500 with a start of Rs.2100/- would be entitled for the benefits of TBPS and those who opted for improved pay scale of Rs.2100-3700 would not be so entitled. In pursuance to office order dated 4.12.1996, two different classes of SAS Superintendents (NG) were formed, one which opted for the initial scale of Rs.2000-3500 with a start of Rs.2100/- and those who opted for the improved pay scale of Rs.2100-3700/-.

8. On 03.07.2001, a communication was made by the Secretary of the Board to its Chief Accounts Officer in the following terms :

    “It is clarified that only those SAS Supdt. (NG), who have completed 9/16 years service on induction post of SAS Supdt. (NG) prior to their re-designation as Assistant Accounts Officer i.e. 6.6.1996 is entitled for the benefit of time bound promotional scale on Punjab State Electricity Board pattern as the post of Assistant Accounts Officer does not exist in P.S.E.B.”

9. As a necessary consequence of above noted communication dated 3.7.2001, a further classification was drawn by the Board between the SAS Superintendents (NG) having opted for the scale of Rs.2000-3500. First, who had become eligible for TBPS before re-designation of the post as Assistant Accounts Officer and second, those who became eligible for TBPS after the re-designation of the post.

10. The Association made a detailed representation to the Member (Finance and Accounts) of the Board on 4.3.2002 and the matter relating to above noted discrimination was taken up with the Board. A meeting, between the Board and the representatives of Association was held on 26.7.2002 in which one of the agenda item was as under:

    “3. Delay in sanction of time bound promotional scale to SAS appointee and subsequently re-designated as A.A.O. which have become due w.e.f. 1

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top