SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 343

RAVI MALIMATH, AJAY MOHAN GOEL
H. P. State Electricity Board Limited & Anr. – Appellant
Versus
Nanak Chand & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ashok Sharma, Advocate, Tara Singh Chauhan, Advocate, A.K. Gupta, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ravi Malimath, A.C.J. - This is a petition filed under Order 47, Rule 1 read with Sections 114 and 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking review of judgment dated 4th September, 2017, passed in CWP No. 2398 of 2016, titled as HPSEB Ltd. & another Vs. Nanak Chand and others & other connected matters.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondents/applicants filed Original Applications before the erstwhile learned Himachal Pradesh State Administrative Tribunal seeking conferment of work charge status from the date they had completed 10 years of continuous service. Vide order dated 24.09.2015, the same was allowed by relying on the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mool Raj Upadhayaya Vs. State of H.P. and others, (1994) Supp2 SCC 316 and other judgments. The same came to be challenged by the respondent therein, namely, the Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited. By the judgment under review, dated 4th September, 2017, the writ petitions were dismissed by relying on various judgments, as relied upon therein. Thereafter, the instant Review Petition has been filed.

3. The learned Senior Advocate appearing for the review petitioners contends th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top