CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Kamlesh – Appellant
Versus
State Of H P & Ors. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J. - The present petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been maintained by the petitioner for quashing of F.I.R No. 03 of 2021, dated 20.03.2021, under Sections 363, 366A, 354, 376 IPC and Sections 4 and 12 of POCSO Act, registered at Female Police Station BCS, Shimla, District Shimla, H.P., alongwith all consequent proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R..
2. Tersely, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that on 20.03.2021 the mother of the victim (complainant) made a complaint to the police, wherein she stated that on19.03.2021 her daughter (victim herein), who is 15 years old, went missing. Despite extensive search efforts, the victim could not be traced. Upon the complaint, so made by the complainant, police registered F.I.R No. 03 of 2021, dated 20.03.2021, under Sections 363, 366A, 354, 376 IPC and Sections 4 and 12 of POCSO Act and the investigation ensued. Police investigation zeroed down on one Kamesh (petitioner herein), so he was arrested. However, now the parties have arrived at compromise, vide compromise Deed, Annexure P-2 and in order to maintain their relation cordial, they do not want to pu
B.S. Joshi and othersvs. State of Haryana and another
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another vs. State of Uttaranchal & Others
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and othersvs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and othersvs.State of Gujarat and another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and another vs. Special Judicial Magistrate and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.