SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 490

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Ajay Mohan Goel, J.
Khem Raj & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. - Respondents
CWP No. 1107 of 2020, 1111 of 2020
Decided On : 01-07-2021

Advocates appeared:
Devender Kumar Sharma, Advocate, Sumesh Raj, Advocate, Dinesh Thakur, Advocate, Sanjeev Sood, Advocate, Divya Sood, Advocate, , Advocate, Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, Balwant Singh Thakur, Advocate, Rupinder Singh, Advocate

Proficiency in Hindi or English cannot be adjudged through multiple choice questions, and no legal right accrued to demand a bilingual question paper.

Headnote:

Language Proficiency - Recruitment Test - [Advertisement No. 22/2019] - [Essential Qualifications: Proficiency in teaching Hindi and English] - The court dismissed the petitions challenging the recruitment test conducted in English only, stating that proficiency in Hindi or English cannot be adjudged through multiple choice questions and that no legal right accrued to demand a bilingual question paper.

Fact of the Case:

The petitions challenged the recruitment test for the post of Lecturer (School-New) Commerce, which was conducted in English only, alleging arbitrariness and discrimination. The petitioners argued that proficiency in Hindi and English was an essential qualification, and the test should have been bilingual. The respondent opposed, stating that no holding out was made regarding the language of the test, and the petitioners participated without protest.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the nature of the questions in the test was standard and not significantly affected by the language. It held that proficiency in Hindi or English cannot be adjudged through multiple choice questions and that no legal right accrued to demand a bilingual question paper. The court also noted that the petitioners participated in the test without protest, estopping them from challenging the process later.

Issues: The main issues were the language proficiency requirement, the alleged arbitrariness and discrimination in conducting the test in English only, and the petitioners' standing to challenge the process after participating without protest.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that proficiency in Hindi or English cannot be adjudged through multiple choice questions and that no legal right accrued to demand a bilingual question paper. It also emphasized that the petitioners participated in the test without protest, estopping them from challenging the process later.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petitions, stating that they were devoid of merit, and vacated any interim orders. The pending miscellaneous applications were also disposed of accordingly.

JUDGMENT

Ajay Mohan Goel, J. - As the factual and legal issues involved in both these petitions are similar, therefore, these petitions are being disposed of by a common judgment.

2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present petitions are as under:-

Vide advertisement No. 18/2019, dated 02.11.2019, respondent-Commission invited applications from desirous and eligible candidates for the posts of Lecturer (School-New) in the department of Higher Education. A copy of said advertisement is appended as Annexure P-1 with CWP No. 1107 of 2020. It is not in dispute that subsequently, this advertisement was rescinded by the Commission and a fresh advertisement was issued by the respondent-Commission, i.e. advertisement No. 22/2019, dated 10.12.2019, appended as Annexure P-4 with CWP No. 1111 of 2020. Hereinafter this Court shall exclusively be referring to advertisement No. 22/2019, for the purposes of facts etc. Vide advertisement No. 22/2019, online recruitment applications were invited from desirous and eligible candidates for filling up the post of Lecturer (School-New) Commerce in the department of Higher Education. The OTRS was to be available on the Commission's website upto 30.12.2019 till 11:59 p.m. A candidate was eligible to participate in the selection process if he or she had passed matriculation from any school/institution situated within Himachal Pradesh, provided that this condition was not to apply to bonafide Himachalis. In terms of the advertisement, the applications were invited for the post of Lecturers for four subjects, including the subject of commerce, which is the subject matter of the present writ petitions. In all 215 posts of Commerce Lecturer (School-New) Class-III (Non-Gazetted) on contract basis, were advertised through said advertisement. These posts were advertised in the pay scale of 10300 34800+4200 Grade Pay. The essential qualifications prescribed in the advertisement were as under:-

"Essential Qualification(s):

1. Academic Qualifications: Master's Degree in the subject concerned from a recognized University (with minimum of 50% marks in aggregate) or its equivalent. Candidates having Master's Degree in Public Administration are eligible for Lecturer (School-New) Political Science.

Lecturer (School-New) Commerce: Commerce with Accountancy Financial Accountancy and Income Tax as major subjects of study. Holder of Degree of MFC (Master of Finance Control) is also eligible for the post of Lecturer (School-New) in Commerce subject from a recognized University.

II. Proficiency in teaching Hindi and English

2. Profession Qualification: Bachelor Education (B.Ed.) as professional qualification from recognized University. Institution with minimum 50% marks OR two year's Integrated M.Sc. Ed. Course or an equivalent course from a recognized University.

Desirable Qualification: Knowledge of customs, manner and dialects of Himachal Pradesh and suitability for appointment in the peculiar conditions prevailing in the Pradesh."

3. The scheme of examination prescribed in the advertisement was as under:-

"SCHEME OF EXAMINATION

1. There shall be a written objective type examination (MCQ) (Computer Based Test Offline Test). Marks obtained in written objective type examination (either online or offline) shall be counted for deciding the merit of the candidates. The candidates, who will qualify the written objective type examination (Computer Based Test Offline Test) will have to appear for evaluation. Final selection of candidates will be made on the basis of marks obtained in the objective type examination (Computer Based Test Offline Test) and evaluation based on the parameters devised by the Department of Personnel vide its notification No. Per. (APB)B(15)-5 2014 dated 17.04.2017 subject to passing of Written Objective Type Examination.

2. Candidates in the ratio of 10 times of total number of posts will be declared qualified in the written objective type examination (MCQ) (Computer Based Test Offline Test) con

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top