SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 498

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Prithvi Chand – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Bhupinder Gupta, Advocate, Janesh Gupta, Advocate, Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate, Yogita Dutta, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vivek Singh Thakur, J. - Plaintiff (appellant herein) has approached this Court against concurrent findings of Courts below whereby suit as well as appeal filed by him have been dismissed by trial Court and first Appellate Court.

2. The plaintiff has filed a suit for declaration that he along with proforma-defendants (respondents No. 2 and 3 herein) is owner of land comprised in Khasra No. 1403/323/419 min (old) and Khasra No. 1403/323/419 min (old) denoted by new khasra Nos. 1779 and 1780 situated in village and mauja Nirath, Tehsil Rampur Bushehr, District Shimla with consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendant State of HP from interfering in possession of plaintiff and proforma-defendants in any manner. Plaintiff has set up a claim that predecessors-in-interest of plaintiff and proforma-defendants were in possession of suit land, which is now in possession of plaintiff and proforma-defendants, as non-occupancy tenants under the owner Devta Surya Narayan, Temple Surya Narayan Nirath and on enactment of H.P. Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1972 (hereinafter referred as Ceiling Act) ownership of land was vested from Devta Surya Narayan to State of HP

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top