SURESHWAR THAKUR, CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Amit Nayyer – Appellant
Versus
State Of H. P. And Ors – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sureshwar Thakur, J. - Through an advertisement embodied in Annexure A-1, the respondents concerned, advertised various posts, for being filled up, on a contractual basis. However, vis--vis the apposite, to the extant writ petition, five posts, of Assistant Professor (Computer Engineering), hence on a contractual basis, also became through Annexure A-1, hence, advertised for being filled up. The petitioner and co-respondent No.3, both, applied for the afore advertised post. However, the writ petitioner was not selected, rather co-respondent No.3 became selected, and, also became appointed. Consequently, through the extant writ petition, a challenge is made by the writ petitioner, to, the selection and appointment of co-respondent No.3 against the afore-advertised post. The essential qualification(s), as prescribed in Annexure A-1, for theirs becoming imperatively possessed by the aspirants concerned, hence, for theirs becoming awarded prorata marks, in consonance therewith, is/are, qua theirs possessing BE/B. Tech. and ME/M. Tech. in the relevant branch of Engineering with first class or equivalent either in BE/B. Tech. or ME/M. Tech.
2. A reading of Annexure A-1, discloses
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.