CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Ajay Kumar S/o Shri Krishan Dayal – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present petition is maintained by the petitioners under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as “the Code”) for quashing of F.I.R. No. 121 of 2012, dated 10.7.2012, under Sections 498-A, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at Police Station Amb, District Una, H.P. alongwith all consequent proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R. pending before the learned trial Court.
2. Briefly stating the facts, giving rise to the present petition, as per the prosecution story, are that respondent No. 2 made a complaint before the police alleging therein that on 13.10.2011, respondent No. 2 solemnized marriage with the petitioner at Village Sapouri, Tehsil Amb, District Una, according to Hindu Rites and ceremonies. After sometime, petitioner started maltreating respondent No. 2 regarding insufficient dowry and started treating her with cruelty. Pursuant thereto, statement of respondent No. 2 came to the Police Station for lodging FIR against the petitioners. Now, the parties have entered into a compromise before the Hon’ble Supreme Court Mediation Centre, in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 256
B.S. Joshi and Others vs. State of Haryana and Another
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another vs. State of Uttaranchal and Others
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and Others vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and Another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and Another vs. Special Judicial Magistrate and Others
Preeti Gupta and Another vs. State of Jharkhand and Another
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Others vs. State of Gujarat and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.