CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Raj Rani, Wd/o. Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
The instant petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as “the Code”), has been maintained by the petitioners for quashing of F.I.R No.117 of 2017, dated 24.6.2017, under Sections 498-A, 120-B, 406, 506 (B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter to be called as “IPC”), registered at Police Station, Amb, District Una, H.P., alongwith all consequent proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R., pending before the learned trial Court.
2. Briefly stating the facts, giving rise to the present petition, as per the prosecution story, are that on 5.2.2016, respondent No.2 solemnized marriage with the accused, namely, Neeraj Sharma, according to Hindu Rites and ceremonies. After sometime, petitioners started maltreating respondent No.2 regarding insufficient dowry and started treating her with cruelty. Consequent upon the statement of respondent No.2, Police registered an FIR against the petitioners. Now, the parties have entered into a compromise, vide Compromise Deed, (Annexure P-1) dated 22nd March, 2021, and they do not want to pursue the case against each other, hence the present petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has arg
B.S. Joshi and others vs. State of Haryana and another
Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand and another
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and others vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another v. State of Uttaranchal & Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.