JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Rajinder Kumar Sood Son of Late Shri Sant Ram – Appellant
Versus
Om Prakash Sood Son of Late Shri Sant Ram – Respondent
ORDER :
An application moved by defendant for rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure was dismissed by the learned trial court. This order has been assailed by the defendant in the present petition.
Parties to the litigation are real brothers, sons of late Shri Sant Ram. The status of the parties hereinafter has been referred to as it was before the learned trial court.
2. Facts
Plaint
2(a) a civil suit was filed by the respondent/plaintiff for-
(ii) for permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the petitioner/defendant from alienating transferring, encumbering, changing the nature of the suit property; and
(iii) for recovery of Rs. 2,00,000/- as damages on account of mental harassment.
2(b) The suit was in relation to property comprised in Khata No. 85/78, Khatauni No. 202/197, Khsra No. 1000, 1001, 1002, 1003, 1004 1005 and 1028 total measuring 02-04-41 Hect. situated in Up Mohal Kalinda, Tehsil Theog, District Shimla. It was pleaded that:-
2(b)(i) The suit property was initially owned by late Shri
Arunima Baruah versus Union of India and Others
Dahiben vs. Arvind Bhai Kalyanji Bhanusali
Dhulabhai etc. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & another
Popat & Kotecha Property vs. State Bank of India Staff Association
Pyare Lal vs. Shubhendra Pilania, minor through natural guardian father Pradeep Kumar Pilania
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation & another vs Bal Mukind Bairwa
Saleem Bhai & others vs. State of Maharashtra & others
Shalini Shyam Shetty & another vs. Rajendra Shanka Patil
South Delhi Municipal Corporation versus Today Homes & Infrastructure
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.