SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 779

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, SATYEN VAIDYA, JJ.
Vikrant Oil Carrier – Petitioner
Versus
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. – Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 3542 of 2021
Decided On : 06-09-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Kshitij Sharma, Prashant Sharma.
For the Respondents: B.C. Negi, Nitin Thakur, Ankush Dass Sood, Rajnish K. Lal.

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14, 21, 226 - Petitioner has assailed award of transportation of bulk white petroleum products, by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited in favour of respondent No.4, in pursuance to tender notice - As per tender document, transporters could apply under three categories. First, those who had tank trucks in their physical possession. Second, those who were ready to offer tank trucks with temporary registration and third, those who belonged to SC/ST categories could make offers with booking slips only - Second category of transporters, as noticed above, could offer tank trucks with 18 KL and above capacity only – Held, from material on record especially from conduct of HPCL and also stand taken by said authority in present matter, sheer arbitrariness on its part is reflected –Allegations being of a very serious nature require investigation especially when forged registration certificates of vehicles are alleged to have been used in deal - No hard-and-fast rule can be laid down as to when High Court should refuse to exercise its jurisdiction in favour of a party who moves it after considerable delay and is otherwise guilty of laches - When substantial justice and technical considerations are pitted against each other, cause of substantial justice deserves to be preferred, for other side cannot claim to have a vested right in injustice being done, because of a non-deliberate delay - Petition allowed.

ORDER :

1. By way of instant petition, petitioner has assailed the award of work (transportation of bulk white petroleum products), by the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (for short ‘HPCL’) in favour of respondent No. 4, M/s. Sai Roadways (for short ‘Sai Roadways’) in pursuance to tender notice dated 23.07.2018.

2. On 23.07.2018, HPCL invited offers, under the two-bid system, for road transportation of bulk white petroleum products ex-Nalagarh for the period 1.10.2018 to 30.09.2023. Estimated tank trucks requirement was as under:

S. No.

Description

White oils

1st to 3rd year

4th to 5th year

1.

Tank trucks with capacity of 12 KL and above and less than 18 KL

48

31

2.

Tank trucks with capacity of 18 KL and above

135

40

3. Due date for submission of bids was 18.08.2018. Technical and financial bids were to be evaluated on 22.09.2018 and 15.10.2018 respectively.

4. As per tender document, the transporters could apply under three categories. First, those who had tank trucks in their physical possession. Second, those who were ready to offer tank trucks with temporary registration and third, those who belonged to SC/ST categories could make offers with booking slips only. The second category of transporters, as noticed above, could offer tank trucks with 18 KL and above capacity only.

5. On 09.08.2018, Sai Roadways submitted its bid and offered total 36 numbers of tank trucks, out of which, three chassis were claimed to be with it with temporary registrations. HPCL accepted the bid of Sai Roadways for 36 numbers offered tank trucks and letter of acceptance (LOA) was issued on 17.12.2018. A formal agreement was signed between HPCL and Sai Roadways on 01.01.2019.

6. As per allegations of petitioner, Sai Roadways violated tender conditions by submitting false information and thereby misrepresented to the HPCL its capacity for the purposes of evaluation. Two out of three tank trucks of more than 18 KL capacity bearing chassis numbers Bj2586 and Bj2579, offered by the Sai Roadways, with temporary registration numbers, were falsely represented to have been purchased from M/s. Yashoda Motors, Patiala (Punjab) vide tax invoices dated 09.08.2018, whereas, these two chassis with No. BJ-2586 and BJ-2579 were sold by M/s. Yashoda Motors to Shri Rajendra Singh resident of Jamnagar, Gujarat and Shri Jagir Singh of Punjab in the first instance. The chassis purchased by Shri Rajinder Singh was temporarily registered with Registering and Licensing Authority, Jamnagar, Gujarat on 02.11.2018 Vide No. GJ-10(T)X-8413 and was further sold on 08.02.2019, by said Shri Rajinder Singh to Sh. Shekhar Chander one of the partners of Sai Roadways. Similarly, Chassis No. BJ-2586 was got registered by Shri Jagir Singh with Registering and Licensing Authority, Patiala (Punjab) under Registration No. PB-11CQ-0415. It was on 29.01.2019 that this chassis was further sold by Shri Jagir Singh in favour of above mentioned, Shekhar Chander.

7. On the above allegations, petitioner maintains that on 09.08.2018, when Sai Roadways uploaded its bid, it was not the owner of, above noticed, two chassis of tank trucks above 18 KL capacity. Even on the date of issuance of LOA i.e. 17.12.2018 and also on the date of signing of agreement dated 01.01.2019, Sai Roadways was neither having ownership of chassis bearing No. BJ-2579 and BJ-2586 nor their temporary registrations. The specific allegation of petitioner is that Sai Roadways submitted false and forged documents in respect of these two chassis for tank trucks above 18KL capacity with HPCL and by fraudulent means succeeded in securing the contract for 36 tank trucks. According to petitioner, Sai Roadways by unfair means has been able to influence the evaluation process in its favour, in which officers of HPCL, especially respondent No. 3 was privy.

8. Basing its claim on the above n

                        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                        1
                        2
                        3
                        4
                        5
                        6
                        7
                        8
                        9
                        10
                        11
                        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                        supreme today icon
                        logo-black

                        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                        Please visit our Training & Support
                        Center or Contact Us for assistance

                        qr

                        Scan Me!

                        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                        whatsapp-icon Back to top