CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Balkar Singh Son of Sh. Bachitar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
The present petition is maintained by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as “the Code”) for quashing of F.I.R No.173/2016 dated 8.9.2016, under Sections 279 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Nalagarh, Police District Baddi, H.P. alongwith all consequent proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R., pending before the learned trial Court.
2. Briefly stating the facts, giving rise to the present petition, as per the prosecution story, are that respondent No.3 made a written complaint to the police alleging therein that on 8.9.2016, around 4:30 p.m, near Soban Majra, Nalagarh, petitioner drove vehicle bearing registration No.HP-12B-9550, in a rash and negligent manner so as to endanger human life and personal safety of others, struck against him, as a result of which, respondent No.3-complainant, received simple injuries. Pursuant to the statement of respondent No.3, above FIR was lodged against the petitioner. Now, the parties have entered into a compromise, vide Compromise deed (Annexure P-2) stating therein that the complainant does not want to pursue the case against the petitioner. Hence, t
B.S. Joshi and others vs. State of Haryana and another
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another v. State of Uttaranchal & Others
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and others vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and another
Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand and another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others ((1998) 5 SCC 749)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.