SANDEEP SHARMA
Hira Nand Shastri S/o Late Shri Daulat Ram – Appellant
Versus
Ram Rattan Thakur S/o Shri Roop Ram – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Instant petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to compound the offence committed by the petitioner under Section138 of the Act in Case No. 58-3 of 2012/11 titled as Ram Rattan vs. Hira Nand decided by the learned JMFC-III, Shimla, vide judgment/order dated 24.6.2013/16.7.2013 and further to quash the sentence of six months awarded to the petitioner.
2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the record are that respondent- complainant instituted a complaint under Section 138 of the Act, in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class-III, Shimla, alleging therein that the accused borrowed sum of Rs. 1,90,000/- from him and with a view to discharge his liability, issued cheque for a sum of Rs. 1,90,000/- (Ext.PW1/A), but fact remains that aforesaid cheque on its presentation, was dishonoured. Since petitioner-accused failed to make the payment good within the time stipulated in the legal notice, respondent/complainant was compelled to initiate proceedings before the competent Court of law under Section 138 of the Act.
3. Learned trial Court on the basis of material adduced on record by the respective parties held the petitioner
Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H. (2010) 5 SCC 663
Kunha Yammed and Others vs. State of Kerala and Others
Kunhayammed vs. State of Kerala
Municipal Corporation, Indore vs. Ratnaprabha
Narinder Singh vs. State of Punjab
Rajinder Prasad vs. Bashir and Others
V.M. Salgaocar and Bros. Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.