SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(HP) 2371

AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Kashetar Pal Singh alias Kripal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Harpal Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri.
For the Respondents: Mr. Sunny Modgil, Ms. Parul Negi.

JUDGMENT :

AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J.

1. By way of this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has prayed for quashing of judgment dated 20.12.2013 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge (II), Una, Camp at Amb, in Criminal Revision No. 1/2012 RBT No. 2/2013/2012, vide which learned Court below while dismissing revision petition so filed by the present petitioner upheld the order passed by learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Amb, District Una, in case No. 74/CR/07 titled State Vs. Harpal Singh instituted under Section 133 of Cr.P.C. dated 03.09.2010.

2. Brief facts necessary for adjudication of this petition are that petitioner Kashetar Pal Singh filed an application before Gram Panchayat, Lower Bhanjal dated 08.04.2007 to the effect that respondent No. 1 Harpal Singh had blocked the flow of rainy and domestic water of the petitioner as well as other local residents near the house of the petitioner which had caused damage to the house of the petitioner. On these bases, a Kalandra was filed by the police, Police Station Amb, under Section 133 of Cr.P.C. against respondent No. 1 Harpal Singh in the Court of learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top