DORAISWAMY RAJU, ARIJIT PASAYAT
State Of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Kedia Leather & Liquor LTD. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arijit Pasayat, J.-View expressed by High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur Bench at Indore holding that after introduction of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the Water Act ) and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as the Air Act ), there was implied repeal of Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the Code ), is questioned in these appeals.
2. Factual background needs to be noted in brief as legal issues of pristine nature are involved. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate (hereinafter referred to as the SDM ) of the area concerned served orders in terms of Section 133 of the Code directing the respondents who owned industrial units to close their industries on the allegation that serious pollution was created by discharge of effluent from their respective factories and thereby a public nuisance was caused. The preliminary issues and the proceedings initiated by the SDM were questioned by the respondents herein before the High Court under Section 397 of the Code.
3. The main plank of their arguments before the High Court was that by enactment of Water Act and th
Municipal Council, Palai through the Commissioner of Municipal Council, Palai v. T.J. Joseph
Shri A.B. Krishna & Ors. v. The State of Karnataka & Ors.
Northern India Caterers (Private) Ltd. and Anr. v. State of Punjab Anr.
Ratan Lal Adukia and Anr. v. Union of India
R.S. Raghunath v. State of Karnataka and Anr.
Vasant Manga Nikumba and Ors. v. Baburao Bhikanna Naidu (deceased) by Lrs. and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.