KURIAN JOSEPH, RAJIV SHARMA
Suraj Ram Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rajiv Sharma, J.
Since common questions of law and facts are involved in both these cases, the same were taken up together for hearing and are being disposed of by a common judgment.
CWP (T) No.5447/2008 (OA No.2455/1998)
2. Petitioners No.1 and 2 were inducted in Himachal Pradesh Forest Service on 22.12.1983. Petitioners have assailed seniority list issued on 23.9.1998 of Himachal Pradesh Forest Service Officers of Himachal Pradesh Forest Department, as it stood on 1.1.1993. According to the seniority list issued on 23.9.1998, respondents No. 2 to 20 are appearing at Sr. No. 11, 12, 17, 23, 26, 29, 32, 36, 39, 43, 47, 51, 55, 58 and 62, respectively. Petitioners rank junior to these respondents. According to the petitioners, respondent-State has not taken into consideration the instructions issued on 7.2.1986 while issuing the seniority list. Case of the respondents, in a nutshell, is that seniority has been drawn on the basis of instructions issued on 22.12.1959 and according to them the instructions dated 7.2.1986 have been adopted with effect from 7.10.1986.
LPA No. 106/2009
3. Appellant was inducted in the Himachal Pradesh Forest Service on 22.12.1983. He has assailed the
State of Himachal Pradesh v. J.L. Sharma and another reported in (1998) 1 SCC 727
B.S. Bajwa and another v. State of Punjab and others
H.S. Vankani and others v. State of Gujarat and Others
Union of India and Another v. S.K. Goel and Others (2007) 14 SCC 641
T.R. Kapoor v. State of Haryana (1989) 4 SCC 71
Bimlesh Tanwar v. State of Haryana
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.