JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Sharma, J.

1. Petitioner has sought quashing of FIR No.80/2011 dated 21.8.2011 under sections 498-A, 403, 406 and 506 read with section 34 I.P.C. registered at Police Station, Gagret, District Una and the subsequent proceedings arising thereof, i.e. Criminal Case No. 481/2013.

2. "Key facts" necessary for the adjudication of this petition are that marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No.3 was solemnized in the year 2008. Two children were born out of the wedlock. However, due to mismatch of temperaments and mutual differences, respondent No.3 filed complaint against the petitioners, which led to registration of FIR No. 80/2011. However, with the intervention of the relative and respectable members of the community, petitioner No.1 and respondent No.3 decided to live together for their better future. They are living together for the one and half years. They have entered into compromise vide Ex.P-2.

3. Since the parties have compromised the matter, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the proceedings pending against the petitioner.

4. Their Lordships of the Honble Supreme Court B.S. Joshi and others v. State of Haryana and another, (2003) 4 SCC 675 have