CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Nawab Ahmad Son Of Shri Latif Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
The present petition is maintained by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as “the Code”) for quashing of F.I.R No. 84 of 2019, dated 29.6.2019, under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 196 of the Motor Vehicles Act, registered at Police Station Dharampur, District Solan, H.P. alongwith all consequential proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R., pending before the learned trial Court.
2. Briefly stated the facts, giving rise to the present petition, as per the prosecution story, respondent No.2 (complainant) made a complaint to the police alleging therein that on 29.6.2019 around 11:00 a.m. near Railway Crossing, Jabli, petitioner drove a vehicle bearing registration No.CH04B-9237 in a rash and negligent manner so as to endanger human life and personal safety of others and struck against a vehicle bearing registration No.HP64-A-8785, as a result of which, respondent No.2 received simple injuries on his right leg. Consequent upon the statement of respondent No.2, Police registered an FIR against the petitioner. Now, the parties have entered into a compromise, vide Compromise Deed (Annexure P-
B.S. Joshi and others vs. State of Haryana and another
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another v. State of Uttaranchal & Others
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and others vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and another
Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand and another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others ((1998) 5 SCC 749)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.