R. P. Sood, S/o. Late Sh. Pyare Lal VS State of H. P. , Through Principal Secretary (Health) to the Govt. of H. P. Shimla

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SANDEEP SHARMA
R. P. Sood, S/o. Late Sh. Pyare Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. , Through Principal Secretary (Health) to the Govt. of H. P. Shimla – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Lovneeesh Kanwar, Mr. Mukul Sood, Mr. Pawan K. Sharma, Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Karan Singh Parmar.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Senior Additional Advocate General.

ORDER :

Since similar questions of facts and law are involved in all these petitions, same were being heard together and are now being disposed of vide this common judgment. However, for the sake of clarity, facts of CWPOA No. 673 of 2019 are being discussed herein below.

2. Petitioners, are working as Senior Laboratory Technicians with the respondent Department, which is the next promotional post for the cadre of Laboratory Attendants. Copy of relevant extract of the Recruitment and Promotion Rules for the post of Senior Laboratory Technician i.e. “The HP Health and Family Welfare Department Sub ordinate class-III services Rectt. & promotion and certain conditions of service (Amendment) Rules, 1986” is annexed as Annexure P-1. Senior Laboratory Technicians in the respondent Department are entrusted the duties of over-all in charge of the laboratory work in various medical colleges hospitals and play a pivotal role in the medical process by assisting the diagnostic decision of the medical officers.

3. State of Himachal Pradesh had been adopting the pay pattern of Punjab in the mat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

SANDEEP SHARMAR. P. Sood, S/o. Late Sh. Pyare Lal – AppellantVersusState of H. P. , Through Principal Secretary (Health) to the Govt. of H. P. Shimla – Respondent

Cases Referred (9)

SANDEEP SHARMA
R. P. Sood, S/o. Late Sh. Pyare Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. , Through Principal Secretary (Health) to the Govt. of H. P. Shimla – Respondent