TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, SATYEN VAIDYA
Ranjeet Kumar Son of Shri Baleshwar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh Through Its Secretary (Home) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Satyen Vaidya, J.
By way of instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for following substantive reliefs:-
ii. That the FIR No.5 of 2022 registered at Police Station Bharari, Shimla under sections 419, 420, 201 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code may kindly be quashed and set aside qua the present petitioner or in alternate the FIR's registered at various police station regarding the leak question paper in Police Constable Recruitment Exam Paper may kindly be clubbed in the interest of justice and fair play.
iii. That the contempt notice may kindly be issued to the respondent authorities as the action of the respondent department arresting the petitioner is in violation of the Judgment Passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Judgment (2014) 8 SCC 273.
iv. That the respondent may kindly be directed to release the petitioner in FIR No.5 of 2022 registered at Police Station Bharari, Shimla under sections 420,
Anju Chaudhary vs. State of Utter Pradesh & Another
Arnab Ranjan Goswami vs. Union of India & Ors
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar
Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another
Kari Choudhary vs. Mst. Sita Devi and others
Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Utter Pradesh and others
Nirmal Singh Kahlon vs. State of Punjab & Others
Ram Lal Narang vs. State (Delhi Administration)
Satyender Kumar Antil vs. CBI, 2022
Surender Kaushik and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.