SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(HP) 459

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Sandeep Sharma, J.
Dr. Suresh Chander Negi S/o. Shri Udham Singh - Petitioners
Versus
Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar, Himachal Pradesh Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Through Its Registrar - Respondents
Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 6113 Of 2020, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 6197 Of 2020, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 2883 Of 2019, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 2913 Of 2019, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 2920 Of 2019, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 2935 Of 2019, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 2948 Of 2019, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 2957 Of 2019, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 2978 Of 2019, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 2981 Of 2019, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 3046 Of 2019, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 3056 Of 2019, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 3077 Of 2019, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 3080 Of 2019, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 3587 Of 2019, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 3637 Of 2019, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 3658 Of 2019, Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) No. 4932 Of 2019.
Decided On : 02-09-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Dilip Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Mr. Manish Sharma & Mr. C.D. Negi, Advocates, Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Naresh kaul, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. B.M. Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Ms. Aruna Chauhan and Mr. Manmohan Katoch, Advocates.

Employees who did not exercise the option were automatically covered under the default clause in the Pension Scheme, entitling them to be governed by the Pension Scheme with all consequential benefits.

Headnote:

Pension Scheme - Employee Rights - 1.1.1997, 25.7.2002 - Summary of Acts and Sections: Pension Scheme, 1997 (Annexure A-24), Notification dated 25.7.2002 (Annexure A-26), Pension Rules (Annexure A-25) - The court discussed the implementation of the Pension Scheme for employees of the respondent-University, the second opportunity provided to employees to switch schemes, and the decisions of the Finance Committee and the Board in regulating cases of employees who did not exercise the option. The court found that employees who did not exercise the option were automatically covered under the default clause in the Pension Scheme, and held that the petitioners were entitled to be governed by the Pension Scheme with all consequential benefits.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners were employees of the respondent-University who opted to be governed by CPF Rules. They sought to switch to the Pension Scheme but were denied by the respondent-University. The court found that the petitioners were entitled to be governed by the Pension Scheme with all consequential benefits.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners were entitled to be governed by the Pension Scheme with all consequential benefits.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioners were entitled to switch from CPF to GPF-cum-Pension and Gratuity Scheme.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that employees who did not exercise the option were automatically covered under the default clause in the Pension Scheme, and therefore, the petitioners were entitled to be governed by the Pension Scheme with all consequential benefits.

Final Decision: The decision of the respondent-University in rejecting the claim of the petitioners for switching over from CPF to GPF-cum-Pension scheme was quashed and set aside. Petitioners were held entitled to be governed by the Pension Scheme as framed from due dates, with all consequential benefits.

ORDER :

1. All the petitions involve same and similar questions, as such, all these petitions were tagged together at different intervals and were being heard together. Now vide this common order, all the petitions are being disposed of. Petitioners have been serving the Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Viswavidyalaya (hereinafter, ‘respondent-University’) in different capacities and earlier approached this court by filing writ petitions, which were later on transferred to erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal and thereafter again to this Court, on abolition of the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal. Two of the petitions were firstly filed as Original Applications before erstwhile Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, which also were later on transferred to this Court and re-registered as Civil Writ Petition (Original Application) (CWPOA’s), as detailed in the memo of parties However, for the sake of clarity, facts of CWPOA No. 6113 of 2020, titled Suresh Chander v. Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Viswavidyalaya are being discussed herein.

2. Pursuant to decision of the Board of Management (hereinafter, ‘Board’) vide item No. 12(33) in its 58th meeting held on 26.3.1996, respondent-University implemented Pension Scheme for its employees with effect from 1.1.1997, which decision was circulated vide Notification dated 1.1.1997 (Annexure A-24), which reads as under:

    “NOTIFICATION

In pursuance of the decision of the Board of Management taken vide item No. 12(33) of its 58th meeting held on 26.3.1996 and the Pension Rules formulated by the Committee so constituted, the Vice-Chancellor, HPKV, Palampur, is pleased to implement the Pension Scheme for the employees of the Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya w.e.f. 1.1.1997. The salient features of the scheme are as under:-

The existing employees of the University have the right to opt for the Pension Scheme or to continue to be governed by the CPF Rules. In case they opt for the Pension Scheme, they have to forego the University contribution credited to their CPF accounts alongwith interest thereon. If however, they opt to continue to be governed by the CPF rules, they will continue to be governed by the existing CPF rules as amended from time to time. In case an existing employee does not give any option within the prescribed period, the pension scheme would automatically be applicable to him.

The cases of employees who have retired from the University service during the period 1.1.1986 to the date of Notification of Pension Scheme, will be governed by rule 1.9 of the Pension Rules.

The existing employees/retired employees/families of the deceased employees are required to exercise option on the prescribed proforma (in qua-drupilcate) within a period of 4 months from the date of notification i.e. upto 30.4.1997. In case of staff posted in Tribal Area, the period of option shall be six months i.e. upto 30.6.1997.

The Pension Scheme would be applicable to all the fresh recruitees from the date of notification of the Pension Scheme.. Option once exercised shall be final. The Pension Rules and proforma for exercising option are enclosed.”

3. Pursuant to the aforesaid Notification, all the petitioners opted to be governed by CPF Rules. Subsequently, the respondent-University on the request having been made by various employees, issued fresh Notification dated 25.7.2002 (Annexure A-26), thereby affording another opportunity to the left out employees to switch over to the Pension Scheme. Notification dated 25.7.2002 reads as under:

    “NOTIFICATION

On the recommendations of the Finance Committee vide Item No. 52(4) of its 52nd meeting held on 4.6.2002 the Board of Management vide Item No. 10 of its 75th meeting held on 28.6.2002 has been pleased to give an opportunity for 2nd option to the left out existing CSKHPKV employees to either retain CPF-cum-Gratuity Scheme or opt for GPF-cum-Gratuity Scheme the said option shall be exercised within 3

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top