IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J.
Gagandeep Singh – Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
Cr. M.P. (M) No. 2455 of 2022
Decided On : 05-12-2022
Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 20, 29, 61 and 85 - Vehicle - Contraband - Possession - Charged - Police party headed by Inspector, received information that a taxi bearing registration No. CH-02-AA-3733 was on its way from Kullu - There were about four/five occupants in vehicle and occupants of car were near Baglaher Bridge where they were in course of finding persons to whom contraband which was in their possession could be sold - As per prosecution, police party was informed that in case vehicle alongwith persons could be apprehended then large quantity of contraband could be recovered - Information was received by police party at around 1.30 a.m - It is further case of prosecution that after completing codal formalities, a raiding party was constituted and when said party reached Baglaher Bridge at Ravindra-Nalagarh-Swarghat Road, it found vehicle parked - Raiding party apprehended the vehicle and after giving their introduction they asked the driver to show his particulars who disclosed same - Other occupants also disclosed their identification which included present petitioner - In course of search, Charas weighing 1.236 kg was recovered from a bag which was kept inside car above hand break - Upon recovery of said contraband, after completion of necessary formalities accused were arrested including present petitioner - Petition is opposed by learned Additional Advocate General, inter-alia, on ground that in terms of the investigation, all accused with common intent had gone to District Kullu, H.P. to purchase contraband - They had reached Manikaran on evening - They had all stayed together and after procuring contraband while on their way back, they were all apprehended by police in possession of 1.236 kg of charas, which is a commercial quantity. Para 4
Finding of Court :
Learned Additional Advocate General further argued that as the contraband recovered from accused is of commercial quantity, provisions of Section 37 of NDPS Act are attracted and in these circumstances, present petition is liable to be dismissed because fact of matter is that petitioner was one of occupants of vehicle from which contraband was recovered and it is not as if he had boarded vehicle a few kilometers from spot where same was apprehended - In present case, petitioner was arrested alongwith other accused while travelling in a car, from which commercial quantity of contraband was recovered - Contention of the petitioner that he is innocent, at this stage, is not substantiated from anything on record and to contrary, status report demonstrates that he was along with other accused, which prima facie demonstrates that there was a common intent on part of all accused in commission of crime - Therefore, as already mentioned hereinabove, Court is not in a position to record its satisfaction that there are reasonable grounds to believe that petitioner is not guilty of offences alleged to have been committed by him.
Result : Petition is dismissed.
JUDGMENT :
AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J.
1. By way of this petition, a prayer has been made for release of the petitioner on bail, in F.I.R. No. 76 of 2022 dated 11.03.2022, registered against him at Police Station Nalagarh, District Solan, H.P. under Sections 20, 29, 61 and 85 of the Narcotic Drug and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter to be referred as ‘NDPS Act’ 1985.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 11.03.2022, a police party headed by Inspector Mohinder Singh, received information that a taxi bearing registration No. CH-02-AA-3733 was on its way from Kullu. There were about four/five occupants in the vehicle and the occupants of the car were near Baglaher Bridge where they were in the course of finding persons to whom the contraband which was in their possession could be sold. As per the prosecution, the police party was informed that in case the vehicle alongwith persons could be apprehended then large quantity of contraband could be recovered. This information was received by the police party at around 1.30 a.m. It is further the case of the prosecution that after completing codal formalities, a raiding party was constituted and when the said party reached Baglaher Bridge at Ravindra-Nalagarh-Swarghat Road, it found the vehicle parked. The raiding party apprehended the vehicle and after giving their introduction they asked the driver to show his particulars who disclosed the same. Other occupants also disclosed their identification which included the present petitioner. In the course of search, Charas weighing 1.236 kg was recovered from a bag which was kept inside the car above the hand break. Upon recovery of the said contraband, after completion of necessary formalities the accused were arrested including the present petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been wrongly implicated by the prosecution in the matter. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner happened to be known to the driver of the vehicle and on his insistence, a few days before the alleged contraband was recovered, the petitioner had accompanied the driver of the vehicle alongwith couple of passengers to Manikaran in District Kullu, H.P. and thereafter, they had proceeded to Kullu and were on their way back from Kullu to Ambala, when the car was apprehended. She further argued that all the other occupants of the vehicle were strangers, as far as petitioner is concerned. He has no connection with them. He was not aware about the contents of the bag from which the alleged contraband was recovered. In these circumstances, she submitted that as the petitioner is innocent and further as the contraband otherwise has not been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner, this petition be allowed and the petitioner be ordered to be released on bail.
4. The petition is opposed by learned Additional Advocate General, inter-alia, on the ground that in terms of the investigation, all the accused with common intent had gone to District Kullu, H.P. to purchase the contraband. They had reached Manikaran on the evening of 09.03.2022. They had all stayed together and after procuring the contraband while on their way back, they were all apprehended by the police in possession of 1.236 kg of charas, which is a commercial quantity. Learned Additional Advocate General further argued that as the contraband recovered from the accused is of commercial quantity, therefore, provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are attracted and in these circumstances, the present petition is liable to be dismissed because the fact of the matter is that the petitioner was one of the occupants of the vehicle from which the contraband was recovered and it is not as if he had boarded the vehicle a few kilometers from the spot where the same was apprehended. As the investigation had revealed, all the occupants of the car had gone to District Kullu together and they were on their way back from Kullu and were together when t
Point of Law : In face of mandate of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, High Court could not and ought not to have released accused therein on bail in view of the fact that large quantity of contraband was ....
Bail - Even in the absence of fulfillment of one of dual conditions prescribed in Section 37 of the NDPS Act, bail cannot be granted.
Point of Law : Court has to keep in mind nature of accusations, nature of evidence in support thereof, severity of the punishment, which conviction will entail, character of the accused, circumstance....
Narcotic substances - Bail dismissed - Section 37 of Act no accused can be released on bail when application is opposed by Public Prosecutor unless court is satisfied that there are reasonable ground....
The stringent conditions for granting bail to drug traffickers under Section 37 of the NDPS Act and the need to prevent their nefarious activities.
The court emphasized that in narcotics cases involving commercial quantities, a presumption of conscious possession applies to all occupants of a vehicle, requiring strict adherence to Section 37 of ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.