SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(HP) 781

AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Duni Chand – Appellant
Versus
Amar Chand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. H.S. Rangra.
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajul Chauhan.

JUDGMENT :

(Ajay Mohan Goel, J.)

1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 04.03.2022, passed by the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Manali, Distt. Kullu, H.P., in terms whereof an application filed under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code, with a prayer to allow the applicant to place on record the documents appended therein, has been dismissed.

2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the impugned order.

3. The respondent herein has filed a complaint against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. This complaint was filed in the year 2016 and is still pending adjudication. After the statement of the accused was recorded under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code and after seven opportunities were granted to him to lead his evidence, he failed to lead complete evidence and thereafter when the matter was being listed for final hearing, an application stood filed by the accused under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code, copy whereof is appended with the petition as Annexure P4. The prayer made in the application was to the effect that the applicant intended to pl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top