Back
SATYEN VAIDYA
Kaul Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
[Satyen Vaidya, J.]
1. Petitioner is an accused in case FIR No. 267/2019, dated 20.11.2019, registered under Section 20 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Act (for short ‘ND&PS’ Act), at Police Station Bhuntar, District Kullu, H.P. Petitioner is in custody since 20.11.2019.
2. Petitioner is facing trial for offences under Section 20 of ND&PS Act in pursuance to challan filed by respondent. The allegation against petitioner is that on 20.11.2019, at about 8:15 am on way leading to Village Bagi Shahri, he was found alongwith his co-accused Chet Ram and Krishan Chand with a bag in the right hand of accused Chet Ram from which 5.679 Kgs of ‘Charas’ was recovered.
3. Petitioner has now prayed for grant of bail on the ground that his constitutional right of expeditious disposal of trial has been infringed. As per petitioner, he is in custody more than three years now and the trial has not concluded, rather, it is progressing at snails pace.
4. In its status report dated 04.01.2023, respondent has submitted that PW-1 and PW-2 have now been summoned for 04.03.2023 for examination before learned Special Judge.
5. Learned Additional Advocate General has opposed the prayer o
Constitutional guarantee of expeditious trial cannot be diluted by applying rigors of Section 37 of ND&PS Act in perpetuity.
Constitutional guarantee of expeditious trial cannot be diluted by applying rigors of Section 37 of ND&PS Act in perpetuity.
Constitutional guarantee of expeditious trial cannot be diluted by applying rigors of Section 37 of ND&PS Act in perpetuity.
Length of custody undergone by the appellant, in Court view the case for bail is made out
Length of custody undergone by the appellant, in Court view the case for bail is made out
Provision of Section 37 of Act, be construed to have same efficacy throughout pendency of trial, notwithstanding, period of custody of accused, especially, when it is weighed against his fundamental ....
The fundamental right to expeditious trial cannot be diluted by statutory provisions such as Section 37 of the ND&PS Act, especially in cases of prolonged pre-trial incarceration.
Constitutional guarantee of expeditious trial cannot be diluted by applying rigors of Section 37 of ND&Ps Act in perpetuity.
Bail – Constitutional guarantee of expeditious trial cannot be diluted by applying rigors of Section 37 of NDPs Act in perpetuity.
Bail – Delay in conclusion of trial is a valid ground to grant bail to accused.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
