SATYEN VAIDYA
Baldev Singh Attri – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Satyen Vaidya, J.
By way of instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following substantive reliefs:-
ii) To direct the respondent No.1 to cancel the planning permission, Annexure P-5 alleged to have been sanctioned in favour of respondent No.7 which is contrary and violative of Act, Bye –laws, Regulations, rules and Interim Development Plan.
iii) To direct the respondent No.2 and 5 to initiate appropriate proceedings against respondent No.7 under T&CP Act, 1977 for carrying out unauthorized construction on the basis of notice issued on 19.12.2018, Annexure P-9 and P-10.
iv) To direct the respondent No.7 to restore the land to its original position w
Akhil Bhartiya Upbhokta Congress vs. State of Madhya Pradesh & others 2011 (5) SCC 29
Balco Employees' Union (Regd.) v. Union of India & Ors.
Bhakra Beas Management Board vs. Krishan Kumar Vij & another
Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board & others vs. T.T. Murali Babu 2014 (4) SCC 108
Dharani Sugars & Chemicals Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors. (2019) 5 SCC 480
Ghulam Quadir vs. Special Tribunal & others 2002 (1) SCC 33
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) vs. Abhilash Lal & others 2020 (13) SCC 234
Pradeep Kumar & others vs.Mysore Urban Development Authority 2016 (3) SCC 422
R & M Trust vs. Koramangala Residents Vigilance Group & others
Shivajirao Nilangekar Patil v. Mahesh Madhav Gosavi (1987) 1 SCC 227
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.