SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(HP) 83

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Renuka Ji Dam Project – Appellant
Versus
Dinesh Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vivek Negi.
For the Respondents: Harinder Singh Rawat, Rupinder Singh Thakur, Anirudh Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, J.

1. These appeals alongwith Cross-Objection, for appreciation of common questions of facts and law, are being decided by this common judgment.

2. Admitted facts of the case are that Project proponent had acquired lands in various villages in District Sirmour for construction of Renukaji Dam and its submerge area including land belonging to respective land owners situated in village Lana-Machher.

3. Land involved in present case was acquired by issuing Section 4 notification under Land Acquisition Act dated 1.8.2009, which was lastly published on 1.9.2009. After completing the due process Award No. 651, under Section 11 of Land Acquisition Act, was announced on 21.8.2012. In the said Award, Land Acquisition Collector had determined the rates of land on the basis of classification as under:

S. No.

Classification of Land

Rates per bigha

1.

Kuhal Abal/Salana

Rs. 7,00,000/-

2.

Obad Awal/Obad Doam

Rs. 3,60,000/-

3.

Banjar Jadeed and Banjar Kadeem

Rs. 2,60,000/-

4. Nakabil, Gair Mumkin and Ghasini. Rs. 60,500/- 4. In Secti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top