Back
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Pran Nath Mehta – Appellant
Versus
Umi Seth @ Urmila Seth (deceased) through LRs. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vivek Singh Thakur, J.
Instant petition, invoking provisions of Article 227 of Constitution of India, has been preferred by defendant No.1 Pran Nath Mehra against the order dated 17th July, 2019, passed by the Civil Judge Manali, District Kullu, in an application filed by proposed plaintiff Sanjay Seth, the legal heir of deceased plaintiff No.1 Umi Seth in Civil Suit No. 63 of 2014 titled Umi Seth and others vs. Pran Nath Mehra and others, whereby Trial Court has allowed the substitution of deceased plaintiff Umi Seth through her legal heirs after condonation of delay.
2. Main pleas to assail the aforesaid order are that application under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC was filed at belated stage, that too without accompanying an application under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condonation of delay and also without filing an application for making any prayer for setting aside the abatement of suit on account of death of plaintiff No.1 Umi Seth. It has been contended that applicant, being son of Umi Seth, had knowledge about death of his mother but he failed to file the application within time and the Trial Court without framing any issue, holding any inquiry with respect to existence
The main legal principle established is the liberal interpretation of procedural provisions to advance substantial justice and the consideration of the essence of the application rather than technica....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of abatement of proceedings under Order XXII of the CPC and the liberal consideration of the prayer for setting aside the abatem....
The court affirmed the principle that procedural rules should receive liberal construction to ensure justice is served, specifically in applications for condonation of delay and substitution of legal....
Delay/Laches/ limitation - Sufficient cause – Meaning of - The expression ‘sufficient cause’ within the meaning of Section 5 of the Act or Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code or any other similar provision s....
The main legal point established is that the timely filing of applications under Order XXII Rule 4 and Rule 9 of the CPC is crucial, and delay cannot be condoned without sufficient cause. Negligence ....
Legal representatives may be impleaded in ongoing litigation when the right to sue survives, with procedural delays considered liberally to facilitate substantial justice.
No specific order for abatement of proceedings under one or other provisions of Order 22 is envisaged and the abatement takes place on its own force by passage of time.
Courts must condone delay in substitution of legal heirs adopting justice-oriented approach over technicalities, enforcing pleader's duty under O.22 R.10A CPC.
Abatement of an appeal under CPC is not automatic upon death if the right to sue survives; presence of a legal representative allows continuation despite procedural delays.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
