VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Sudhakar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Nandini Mishra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Vivek Singh Thakur, J.
Instant petition has been preferred, invoking provisions of Article 227 of Constitution of India, for setting aside order dated 11.11.2019, passed by Additional District Judge, Solan, whereby application filed by the petitioners-defendants under Order 7 Rule 11 (d) of Code of Civil Procedure (in short ‘CPC’) has been rejected.
2. Main ground to make prayer for rejecting the plaint is that respondents-plaintiffs have never had possession of the suit property and, therefore, prayer to declare them owner in possession is devoid of merit and petitioners-defendants have preferred a suit for declaration only but without consequential relief seeking possession of the suit property and, therefore, suit is barred by provisions of Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) and thus the plaint is liable to be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 (d) CPC.
3. Plea of respondents-plaintiffs is that averments made in the application, filed for rejecting the plaint, are to be adjudicated and decided on merit in main suit and, thus, application is not maintainable at this stage. It has been claimed that respondents-plaintiffs have been
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.