Pushap Lata vs State of H. P. - 2023 Supreme(HP) 525

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(HP) 525

RANJAN SHARMA
Pushap Lata – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Surinder Prakash Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. B.C. Verma, Adv

JUDGMENT :

Ranjan Sharma, J.

Notice. Mr. B.C. Verma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioner, who was appointed as Drawing Master, initially through Parents Teachers Association (PTA), under the H.P. Grant-in-Aid to PTA Rules, 2006, and as per the Government Policy was later brought on Government Contract; and was regularized on same post belatedly, has come up before this Court, seeking the following relief:-

“That writ of mandamus may kindly be issued, directing the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner from the due date i.e. January, 2018 i.e. on completion of 3 years continuous contractual service, in terms of the regularization policy and in terms of the judgment dated 31.08.2022 passed by this Hon’ble Court in CWP No.342/2021 titled as Yashwant Singh & others v/s State of H.P. & others alongwith other connected matters (Annexure P-1), with all consequential benefits including seniority at appropriate place.”

3. Case of the petitioner as submitted by Mr. Surinder Prakash Sharma, learned counsel is, that being eligible, the petitioner was initially appointed as Drawing Master on 06.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document