SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(HP) 21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
M/s Amrit Traders – Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Civil Writ Petition No. 3284 of 2024
Decided On : 07-05-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ajay Vaidya.
For the Respondent: Rajan Kahol.

Headnote:

License Renewal - Excise Policy - Himachal Pradesh Excise Act, 2011, Section 68(2) - 10.8, 9.8, Rule 19-A - The judgment discusses the renewal of a liquor license under the Himachal Pradesh Excise Act, 2011, and the relevant conditions of the Excise Policy for the years 2023-24 and 2024-25. It highlights the interpretation of the conditions for license renewal, the impact of amendments to the GST Registration Certificate, and the relevance of Rule 19-A of The Himachal Pradesh Liquor License Rules, 1986.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner held a liquor license in form L-10BB for a departmental store at Manali, which was initially issued for a branch and subsequently sought renewal for the principal place of business. The Excise Department refused the renewal based on the condition that L-10BB licenses shall not be allowed to function from the branches of the departmental store.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner had taken adequate steps to shift the business from the branch office to the principal place of business and had obtained an amended GST Registration Certificate. The court also noted that the conditions for license renewal under the Excise Policy did not explicitly prohibit the renewal of licenses for businesses that had shifted from branch to principal place of business.

Issues: The key issues revolved around the interpretation of the Excise Policy conditions for license renewal, the impact of the amended GST Registration Certificate, and the relevance of Rule 19-A of The Himachal Pradesh Liquor License Rules, 1986.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the conditions in the Excise Policy for license renewal cannot be enforced if they are contrary to the rules governing liquor licenses, especially when the rules do not explicitly prohibit the renewal of licenses for businesses that have shifted from branch to principal place of business.

Final Decision: The court quashed the order refusing the renewal of the license and directed the respondents to accept the petitioner's prayer for the renewal of the license L-10BB, considering the premises' upgrade to the principal place of business as evidenced by the amended GST Registration Certificate.

 

1. Instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India lays challenge to order dated 16.04.2024 passed by Financial Commissioner (Excise), Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, whereby the appeal filed under Section 68(2) of the Himachal Pradesh Excise Act, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act’) laying therein challenge to order dated 30.03.2024 passed by Collector (Excise)-cum-Joint Commissioner (ST&E), Central Zone, Mandi, came to be dismissed.

2. Precisely, the facts of the case, which may be relevant for the adjudication of the case at hand are that in the month of February-March 2023, respondent-State, like every year formulated the policy for allotment of retail and other liquor licenses for the financial year 2023-24 (Annexure P-1).

3. Petitioner herein was license holder in form L-10BB, at The Mall Road, Manali, District Kullu since 2021-22, particularly in view of the conditions as contained in aforesaid policy (Clause 11.8). Aforesaid license though was initially issued in favour of petitioner-firm on 07.08.2021 in compliance to the Excise Announcements/Conditions/Clarifications issued from time to time, but subsequently, same was renewed for the year 2022-23 and 2023-24 (Annexure P-2 Colly).

4. Vide communication dated 02.08.2021 (Annexure P-3), it came to be clarified on behalf of respondent-State that if the gross annual tunrover of the departmental store (inclusive of branches) is more than Rs. 2 crore, then only one license in form L-10BB shall be granted in respect of that departmental store or branch. Aforesaid clarification subsequently came to be withdrawn vide communication dated 20.12.2023 issued by respondent-department (Annexure P-4), where it came to be clarified that in super-session to all such past references/instructions/clarifications etc. regarding grant of license in form L-10BB, it is directed that the license in form L10-BB shall be granted strictly as per condition No. 10.8 of Excise Policy for the year 2023-24.

5. As a result of aforesaid clarification, license in form L-10BB granted in favour of petitioner as well as other similar situate persons was made operative, only in such of cases where business in terms of aforesaid license was done from the principal place of business, not from the branches. Since petitioner-herein was admittedly being license holder in form L-10BB, had been running his business from branch, it immediately applied for amendment of GST Registration Certificate (Annexure P-7), which prayer of him ultimately came to be allowed on 09.04.2024, as is evident from Registration Certificate issued in favour of petitioner-firm (available at page No. 61 of the paper-book).

6. It is pertinent to take note of the fact that petitioner herein beside making prayer to Goods and Services Tax Department also filed an application to the Principal Secretary (Excise and Taxation), Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla on dated 26.03.2024 (Annexure P-6), thereby making request for renewal of license in form L-10BB. In aforesaid representation, petitioner specifically apprised authority concerned with regard to his intention to shift business from branch office to principal place of business. He also apprised factum with regard to the pendency of prayer made on his behalf for amendment in GST Registration Certificate, however, fact remains that aforesaid prayer made on behalf of the petitioner was not paid any heed. Again, vide communication dated 30.01.2024, petitioner requested Deputy Commissioner, State Taxes and Excise, Kullu, District Kullu to renew the license in form L-10BB for the year 2024-25, but in vain. After amendment in GST Registration Certificate, whereby status of branch at The Mall Manali, Tehsil Manali, District Kullu, came to be updated in place of branch to that of principal place of business, petitioner once again requested Principal Secretary (Excise and Taxation), Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla to renew the license in form L-10BB, but no action was taken

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top