SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Cal) 19

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.
M/s. Down Town Temptation Private Limited & Anr. - Appellants
Versus
Additional General Secretary, Finance Department, Government Of W.b. & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.A No. 17757 of 2022
Decided On : 19-01-2023

Advocates appeared:
Soumya Mazumder, Advocate, Arindam Jana, Advocate, Saptarshi Banerjee, Advocate, Somosh Ghosh, Advocate, Anirban Ray, Advocate, Raja Saha, Advocate, Debashis Ghosh, Advocate, Amit Kr Ghosh, Advocate, Varun Kothari, Advocate

The grant or refusal of Excise Licenses must be in accordance with the specific and non-exhaustive conditions provided in the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, and the West Bengal Excise (Selection of New Sites and Grant of License for Retail Sale of Liquor and Certain Other Intoxicants) Rules, 2003, and the State cannot rely on Police Reports and the pendency of cases against an individual to refuse the renewal of an Excise License unless the defence forms part of the relevant sections of the Act and Rules.

Headnote:

EXCISE LICENSE RENEWAL - REJECTION - GROUNDS - IMMORAL ACTIVITIES - INVOLVEMENT OF INDIVIDUAL - LIFTING OF CORPORATE VEIL - APPLICABILITY OF RULES - EQUALITY AND FAIRNESS MANDATE - ACT 1909 AND RULES 2003 - INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged three orders rejecting the renewal of their Excise Licenses for three restaurants-cum-bars on grounds of immoral activities and the involvement of an individual, Jagjit Singh, in criminal activities. The authorities relied on Police Reports and the pendency of cases against Jagjit Singh.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the rejection of the Excise License renewal was not in accordance with the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, and the West Bengal Excise (Selection of New Sites and Grant of License for Retail Sale of Liquor and Certain Other Intoxicants) Rules, 2003. The Court found that the Act and Rules provided specific and non-exhaustive conditions for refusing a license to an existing license holder, and that the impugned orders did not satisfy these conditions.

Issues: 1. Whether the rejection of the Excise License renewal was in accordance with the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, and the West Bengal Excise (Selection of New Sites and Grant of License for Retail Sale of Liquor and Certain Other Intoxicants) Rules, 2003? 2. Whether the State could rely on Police Reports and the pendency of cases against an individual to refuse the renewal of an Excise License? 3. Whether the State could lift the corporate veil of the petitioner company to find out who was in actual control of the company? 4. Whether the State could discriminate between different entities in the grant of Excise Licenses?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the Bengal Excise Act, 1909, and the West Bengal Excise (Selection of New Sites and Grant of License for Retail Sale of Liquor and Certain Other Intoxicants) Rules, 2003, provided specific and non-exhaustive conditions for refusing a license to an existing license holder, and that the impugned orders did not satisfy these conditions. 2. The Court held that the State could not rely on Police Reports and the pendency of cases against an individual to refuse the renewal of an Excise License unless the defence formed part of the relevant sections of the Act and Rules. 3. The Court held that the State could not lift the corporate veil of the petitioner company in the absence of any case made out with reference to commission of fraudulent activities by the company. 4. The Court held that the State could not discriminate between different entities in the grant of Excise Licenses and that the petitioners had been discriminated against by reason of differential treatment.

Final Decision: The Court quashed the impugned orders and directed the concerned respondents to revisit the applications for renewal of licenses of the petitioners for the three establishments and pass reasoned orders in accordance with the Act, Rules, and the order of the Finance Department of the State.

JUDGMENT

Moushumi Bhattacharya, J. - The petitioners are aggrieved by three orders dated 15th December, 2020, 3rd August, 2021 and 21st June, 2022 in the matter of rejection of the renewal of Excise Licenses of the petitioner no. 1. The first two orders are of the Excise Commissioner and the last order is of the Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government of West Bengal.

2. The renewal of Excise License pertains to three restaurants-cum-bars namely, Spice Garden, located at VIP Road and Chinar Park and Hotel Down Town at Teghoria. All three establishments enjoyed Excise License from 2001 onwards. The petitioner applied for renewal in March 2017. The petitioners approached the Excise Commissioner for renewal of Excise License for the three establishments. The proceeding resulted in the first impugned order of 15th December, 2020 citing an objection received from the Bidhannagar Police thereby calling for a fresh report from the Commissioner of Police, Bidhannagar. The petitioner approached the Court by way of an earlier writ petition being WPO 201 of 2021 which was disposed of by a direction on the Excise Commissioner to dispose of the appeal under the provisions of The Bengal Excise Act, 1909, within a certain time frame.

3. The second impugned order of 3rd August, 2021 was passed by the Excise Commissioner whereby the petitioner's application for renewal of Excise License was rejected.

4. The third impugned order dated 21st June, 2022 deals with the question of renewal of the Excise License of all three establishments of the petitioners, namely, the two Spice Garden restaurants and Hotel Down Town.

5. The consistent finding of the Excise Commissioner and the Additional Chief Secretary is commission of offences under the Indian Penal Code and The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 in the concerned restaurants. The other finding is of one Jagjit Singh being involved with the affairs of the three establishments and pendency of cases against the said Jagjit Singh.

6. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the pendency of judicial proceedings or Police Reports cannot form the basis of a rejection of an application for renewal of Excise License. Counsel relies on the provisions of The Bengal Excise Act, 1909 and The West Bengal Excise (Selection of New Sites and Grant of License for Retail Sale of Liquor and Certain Other Intoxicants) Rules, 2003 for this purpose. Counsel submits that the State cannot give preferential treatment to those on a similar footing to that of the petitioners.

7. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the State respondents relies on the Police Reports which were before the authorities at the time of rejection of renewal of the Excise Licenses. Counsel stresses on the immoral activities being carried on in the three restaurants of the petitioners and submits that this is a fit case for refusing renewal of license as there is a question of law and order. Counsel also places emphasis on the activities of Jagjit Singh in coercing girls into prostitution in the three premises. Counsel urges the Court to lift the corporate veil of the three establishments to ascertain the involvement of Jagjit Singh in the day to day affairs of the restaurants. It is further submitted that the petitioners' liquor license expired in 2017 and hence the petitioners would have to rely on the Rules which were in existence at the relevant point of time.

8. The question before the Court is whether the impugned orders, particularly the order dated 21st June, 2022 rejecting the petitioner's application for renewal of Excise Licenses on and from the year 2017-2018, were in consonance with the Act of 1909 and the relevant Rules framed thereunder. The State authorities rejected the application for renewal primarily on the ground of immoral activities taking place in the restaurants and the part played by Jagjit Singh, a relative of two of the directors of the establishments, in commission of criminal act

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top