Dharam Singh Kapoor vs Hira Chand - 2024 Supreme(HP) 109

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(HP) 109

SATYEN VAIDYA
Dharam Singh Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
Hira Chand – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Abhinav Ghabroo, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Maan Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Satyen Vaidya, J.

By way of instant petition, the petitioners have assailed the order dated 23.06.2023 passed by learned Civil Judge, Manali, District Kullu, H.P. in Civil Suit No. 59 of 2018 titled Hira Chand and others vs. Om Prakash and others, whereby the application of the petitioners herein for impleadment as party defendants under Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been dismissed.

2. Plaintiffs (respondents No. 1 to 3 herein) have filed Civil Suit No. 59 of 2018 before the learned Civil Judge, Manali, District Kullu, H.P. for the following relief:-

“It be declared that plaintiffs are owners in possession of land measuring 00-18- bighas out of total land measuring 01-15-0 01-13-05 bighas comprised in Khasra Nos. 2266 and 2268 Kitas-2, contained in Khata/ Khatouni No. 118 min/288 and 298 min (old), 7/12 and 2 min/5( new), situated at Phati Baran Kothi Baragarh Teltsil Manali, District Kullu, HP as per the sale deed No.508 dated 11.09.975 qua the share of late Sh. Parsa by excluding the alleged wrongly entered share of late Sh. Safra and revenue entries qua the suit land are liable to be entered in the revenue record and the review of mutation No. 1164 ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document