Back
SATYEN VAIDYA
Dandu Ram – Appellant
Versus
Krishan Chand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Satyen Vaidya, J.
By way of instant petition, petitioners have assailed order dated 28.9.2022, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Court No.3, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur in CMA No. 587-6/2022 in Civil Suit No. 27-1/2022.
2. Brief background of the case is that the petitioners and respondents herein are defendants and plaintiffs respectively in Civil Suit No. 27-1/2022, pending before the learned Civil Judge, Ghumarwin. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter shall be referred to by the same status as they hold in the main suit.
3. Plaintiffs have sought a decree of declaration to the effect that they are entitled to get their half share partitioned from the defendants in the suit land, which in totality measures 13 bighas situated in Village Panyala, Tehsil Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur (hereinafter referred to as ‘the suit land’). In addition, a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction has also been prayed for by restraining the defendants from raising construction of any kind over any part of the suit land and particularly from installing gate over the road which leads from the house of the plaintiffs to the main road through courtyard of defendants. In alte
The court emphasized the need to maintain equitable balance between the parties and found that the installation of railings by the defendants violated the previous court order, leading to interferenc....
The Appellate Court cannot, in an appeal against an interim order, appoint a commissioner to collect evidence on merits or pre-emptively decide factual disputes that are explicitly reserved for full ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the scope of granting injunction and the requirement for the relief sought by a defendant to arise out of the relief sought in the action before th....
The court established that an easementary right can be acquired through long-term, uninterrupted use, even if the specific phrase 'as of right' is not explicitly stated in the pleadings, provided the....
A suit seeking injunctive relief must include a declaration of rights to be valid; otherwise, the relief sought is unsustainable if no such declaration is made.
To secure a permanent injunction regarding immovable property, the plaintiff must adequately plead and prove distinct rights and clearly identify the property in question.
The court upheld the trial court's injunction order, affirming the plaintiff's exclusive ownership of the pathway and rejecting the defendants' claims of easementary rights due to lack of evidence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
