Ramesh Kumar vs Sunder Singh (since deceased) through his LRs. Shri Jagdish Chand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(HP) 157

AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Ramesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sunder Singh (since deceased) through his LRs. Shri Jagdish Chand – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pranjal Munjal, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Praveen Chandel, Advocate

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for specific legal relief (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of the underlying civil suit (Para 3)
3. trial court's allowance of amendments (Para 4)
4. background facts of the case regarding amendment applications. (Para 5)
5. legal standard for amendments under order 6 rule 17 (Para 6 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12)
6. importance of due diligence in amendments (Para 7 , 13 , 14 , 15)
7. statutory provisions governing amendments to pleadings. (Para 9)
8. critique of trial court’s order on amendment (Para 16 , 17)
9. final ruling on petition and order (Para 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Mohan Goel, J.

By way of this petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following relief:-

“It is, therefore, prayed that petition may be accepted and impugned Orders both dated 21.06.2023 Annexure P-6 may be ordered to be quashed and set aside and consequently the application filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure being C.M.A. No. 93/6 of 2022, CNR: HPS 1070003662023, Registration No. 183/2023 (Filing No. 366 of 2023) and application under Order 8 Rules 1- A of the Code of Civil Procedure C.M.A. No. 94/6 of 2022, CNR: HPS 1070003672023, Registration No. 184/2023 (F

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(HP) 157

AJAY MOHAN GOELRamesh Kumar – AppellantVersusSunder Singh (since deceased) through his LRs. Shri Jagdish Chand – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Ramesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Sunder Singh (since deceased) through his LRs. Shri Jagdish Chand – Respondent