SATYEN VAIDYA
Mukesh Verma – Appellant
Versus
Kharaiti Lal Malhotra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Satyen Vaidya, J.
Heard.
2. Both these petitions are being decided by a common judgment as identical questions of facts and law are involved.
Civil Revision No. 115 of 2023
3. By way of this petition, the landlord Sh. Mukesh Verma, has assailed order dated 05.07.2023, passed by learned Appellate Authority, Solan, H.P. in Rent Appeal No. 4-S/14 of 2022, whereby, after setting -aside the order dated 29.12.2022, passed by learned Rent Controller-2, Solan, H.P. in Rent Petition No. 9/2 of 2020, the landlord has been directed to immediately restore the essential service of the tenanted premises of respondent/tenant Shri Kharaiti Lal Malhotra by clearing sand/debris and other waste material stacked on its roof and removal of weeds etc. The landlord has also been directed to keep the drainage outlets in working condition.
CMPMO No. 23 of 2023
4. By way of this petition, petitioner herein/tenant Sh. Kharaiti Lal Malhotra has assailed order dated 16.12.2022, passed by learned Civil Judge, Court No.1, Solan, District Solan, H.P. in CMA No. 301/6 of 2022, whereby his application under Order 26 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed in Execution Petition No. 1/10 of 2017 for appointme
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.