RANJAN SHARMA
Dina Nath – Appellant
Versus
Shankar Dass – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RANJAN SHARMA, J.
1. The petitioner, Dina Nath, a convict under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, has come up, in this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking quashing of the judgments passed by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lahaul & Spiti at Kullu [hereinafter referred to as ‘Learned Trial Court’] dated 02.04.2022/12.04.2022 [Annexure P-1], in Complaint No. 211-1 of 2015, titled as Shankar Dass vs. Dina Nath, which was affirmed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kullu, District Kullu [H.P.] [hereinafter referred to as ‘Learned Appellate Court’] in Criminal Appeal No. 14 of 2022, titled as Dina Nath vs. Shankar Dass, on 08.08.2022 [Annexure P-2].
2. Consequent upon the conviction and sentence imposed by the Learned Trial Court, which was affirmed by the Learned Appellate Court, the Learned Counsel for the petitioner-accused submits that during the pendency of instant proceedings, the petitioner-accused [Dina Nath], has remitted the entire liability of Rs. 2,80,000/- [Rupees Two Lakh Eighty Thousand] to the respondent-complainant [Shankar Dass], which is borne out from the receipt dated 09.03.2024 [Annexure P-3] and
Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H. (2010) 5 SCC 663
JIK Industries Ltd. vs. Amarlal V. Jumani
K.M. Ibrahim vs. K.P. Mohammed and Another
Meters and Instruments Private Limited and Another v. Kanchan Mehta
Mrs. Shakuntala Sawhney vs. Mrs. Kaushalya Sawhney and Others
P. Mohanraj and Others vs. Shah Brothers Ispat Private Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.