IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Satyen Vaidya, J.
Jagdish alias Baba - Petitioner
Vs.
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr.MP(M)No. : 3242 of 2023
Decided On : 12-01-2024
Bail - Sexual Offence - The court dismissed the bail petition of the accused who was charged with sexual offences under Sections 376, 506 of the IPC and Section 4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The court found the allegations to be serious and grave, and the petitioner's release on bail would not be in the interest of society.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for charges of committing sexual intercourse with a victim under the pretext of super natural powers.
Finding of the Court:
The court found the allegations to be serious and grave, and the petitioner's release on bail would not be in the interest of society. The court dismissed the bail petition.
Issues: The delay in reporting the matter, the seriousness of the allegations, and the potential threat to society if the petitioner is released on bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the nature of accusations, gravity of the offence, and the potential threat to society in deciding to dismiss the bail petition.
Final Decision: The bail petition was dismissed by the court.
JUDGMENT :
Satyen Vaidya, J.
By way of instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for grant of bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.
2. The allegations against the petitioner is that he has been indulging in purported sorcery on the pretext of curing the health problem of masses. The mother of the victim herein was also getting cure for her headache from petitioner. On 15.03.2022, the victim had accompanied her mother to the premises of petitioner and on that day petitioner had committed sexual intercourse with the victim by influencing and terrorizing the victim on the basis of his purported super natural powers. The matter was reported to the police on 21.03.2022. As regards delay in reporting the matter, an explanation has been rendered to the effect that the victim was so terrorized and afraid that she could not disclose the fact to her mother. The victim thereafter visited her elder sister at Chandigarh and disclosed the entire episode to her on 18.03.2022. The sister of the victim then informed her mother and the victim returned to her mother on 20.03.2022 and the matter was accordingly reported on 21.03.2022.
3. On completion of investigation, challan was presented. The petitioner has been charged under Sections 376, 506 of the IPC and Section 4 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The petitioner is facing trial and the prosecution evidence has partially been recorded.
4. Petitioner has prayed for grant of bail on the ground that he has been implicated in a false case. As per petitioner, the delay in registration of FIR is completely unexplained and such fact itself is sufficient to falsify the prosecution story. It is further contended that there is no corroborative evidence available on record. Petitioner has already suffered prolonged pre-trial incarceration. Petitioner has undertaken to abide by all terms and conditions in case he is ordered to be released on bail.
5. Per contra, the prayer has been stronger opposed by the learned Additional Advocate General.
6. It has been submitted that the petitioner is an accused of very serious and heinous offence. The victim, her sister and mother have already been examined as witnesses and they have fully supported the prosecution case. The petitioner is also facing similar allegations in few other cases.
7. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have also gone through the entire record carefully.
8. As per the prosecution case, victim was below the age of 18 years at the time of commission of alleged offence. The petitioner is more than 30 years old. The allegations prima facie divulge the victim being exploited by the petitioner only for his lust.
9. The allegations against the petitioners are very serious and grave. The petitioner is alleged to have used the pretence of having super natural powers to cure the ailments of others to not only befool the others, but to satisfy his lust.
10. The status report reveals that the petitioner was also named an accused in case FIR No.108/2019, dated 31.03.2019, registered at Police Station Nalagarh, under Sections 376, 328 and 506 of the IPC. Similar allegations have been levelled against the petitioner by one of the cousin of victim, who has been examined as PW-4 in the instant case. At her instance, petitioner has been implicated as an accused in FIR No. 17 of 2022, dated 21.03.2022 under Sections 376 and 506 of the IPC.
11. Nature of accusations, gravity of offence and the material available with the prosecution in support of such allegations are material factors for consideration at the stage of bail. In the instant case, the allegations are quite serious and it cannot be said that the prosecution prima facie does not have sufficient material to implicate the petitioner.
12. In light of aforesaid allegations, it can be reasonably inferred that the release of petitioner on bail will not be in the interest of society as he is a potential threat and may indulge in similar activities under the guise of alleged su
The seriousness of the allegations and the potential threat to society are material factors for consideration in deciding a bail petition for serious and grave offences.
Right of speedy trial is a valuable constitutional right.
Provisions relating to sexual assaults on minors have been made very stringent in Indian Penal Code, besides enactment of a special Act known as “The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act.
The court considered the delayed FIR, lack of support from the medical report, and overall material produced on record in granting bail to the applicant without commenting on the merits of the case.
Court is required to balance rights of petitioner on one hand and public interest on other. Test of objectivity is to be applied.
Point of Law : POCSO – Grant of Bail - victim had not disclosed the factum of sexual assault on her by the petitioner, in her initial version to the police. The successive statements of the victim ha....
The court considered the lack of support from key witnesses, the petitioner's extended custody, and the absence of other cases against the petitioner in granting bail pending trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.