RAKESH KAINTHLA
Subhash Chand – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
The present revision is directed against the judgment dated 22.12.2012, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kangra at Dharamshala, H.P. vide which the judgment dated 27.09.2007 and order dated 28.09.2007 convicting the petitioners (accused before the learned Trial Court) for the commission of offence punishable under Section 379 read with Section 34 of IPC and sentencing them to undergo simple imprisonment for two years and pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in case of default to further undergo simple imprisonment for six months was upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience).
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revision are that the police filed a challan against the accused for the commission of offence punishable under Section 379 read with Section 34 of IPC. It was asserted that JTO Lalit Thakur (PW-1) made a complaint to the police (Ext.PW-1/A) stating that 20 pairs of cable measuring 400 meters worth Rs.9200/- were stolen on the intervening night of 24.04.2006 and 25.04.2006 at Deol Phatahar, Telephone Exchange. The police registered the F
State of Uttar Pradesh Versus Nahar Singh 1998 (3) SCC 561
A.E.G. Carapiet v. A.Y. Derderian 1961 AIR(Cal) 359
Karamjit Singh versus State AIR 2003 S.C 3011
State v. N.M.T. Joy Immaculate
M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra [AIR 1954 SC 300: 1954 Cri LJ 865
Tahsildar Singh v. State of U.P.
Bhoju Mandal v. Debnath Bhagat
Pooran Mal v. Director of Inspection (Investigation)
Jagir Singh v. The State (Delhi Administration)
Sat Pal vs. Delhi Administration AIR 1976 S.C. 294
Budh Ram Versus State of Himachal Pradesh 2020 CrLJ 4254
Karnel Singh vs. State 1995 (5) SCC 518
A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras [1950 SCC 228: AIR 1950 SC 27: 1950 SCR 88 at 120: 1950 SCJ 174]
Manju Ram Kalita v. State of Assam
Ashok alias Dangra Jaiswal versus State of Madhya Pradesh
Selvaraj @ Chinnapaiyan versus State represented by Inspector of Police
Muddasani Venkata Narsaiah (Dead) through LRs. v. Muddasani Sarojana
Raja and Others versus State of Karnataka
In re Guli Venkataswamy [AIR 1950 Mad 309]
Sachin Kumar Singhraha v. State of M.P. (2019) 8 SCC 371 = 2019 SCC OnLine SC 363
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.