SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 361

J. R. MUDHOLKAR, K. SUBBA RAO, SYED JAFAR IMAM
Bhoju Mandal – Appellant
Versus
Debnath Bhagat – Respondent


Advocates:
BHAVANI LAL, Jagadish Chandra, P.C.AGRAWAL, R.B.BISVAS

Judgement

SUBBA RAO, J. : The only question in this appeal is whether the suit document is a Mortgage by conditional sale or a sale with a condition repurchase.

2. The facts that gave rise to this appeal may be briefly stated: On February 2, 1924, the appellants 1 and 2, their father late Matooki Mandal and their uncle late Lila Mandal executed a deed purporting to convey a property of the extent of 12.6 acres in favour of respondents 1 and 2 for a consideration of Rs.2,800/- and put them in possession of the same. In 1950 the appellants instituted title suit No. 73 of 1950 in the Court of the Munsif, 1st Court, Bhagalpur Bihar, for redemption on the ground that the said document was a mortgage by a conditional sale. The contesting defendants i.e. respondents 1 and 2 pleaded that the said document was not a mortgage but an out and out sale and therefore the suit for redemption was not maintainable. The Munsif and on appeal the Subordinate Judge, Bhagalpur, accepted the contention of the appellant and decreed the suit but on second appeal the High Court held that the document was a sale and on that finding the appeal was allowed and the suit was dismissed with costs throughout. The ap


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top