Isha Sharma vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(HP) 240

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, J
Isha Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Shivani Priya & Ms. Dhanvanti, proxy counsels, for Ms. Anubhuti Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, ASI Bharat Bhushan, Police Station Shimla West, District Shimla, HP present in person.

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Sharma, J.

Sequel to order dated 11.04.2025, whereby petitioner was ordered to be enlarged on interim bail in FIR No. 0042 dated 11.03.2025 under Sections 115 (2), 191(2), 191(3), 109 and 190 of BNS, registered at PS Shimla West, District Shimla, HP, respondent-State has filed status report prepared on the basis of the investigation carried out by the Investigating Agency and ASI Bharat Bhushan has come present with record.

2. Close scrutiny of status report reveals that pursuant to order dated 11.04.2025, petitioner herein has joined investigation and at this stage, nothing remains to be recovered from her. Though, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, attempted to argue that petitioner is accused of heinous crime punishable under Section 109 of BNS, but he was unable to dispute that co- accused in similar facts and circumstances already stands enlarged on bail. Otherwise also, careful perusal of FIR, detailed hereinabove, reveals that complainant Yograj lodged a complaint on 11.03.2025 that while he along with his friends was having tea in eatery, 30-40 students belonging to Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad came on the spot carrying weapons. He f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document