Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Rajesh Kumar Patil – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.)
Petitioner No.1, serving as Incharge Literacy-cum-District Adult Education Officer, and Petitioner No.2, serving as Project Officer in the respondent-Education Department, retired on 31.12.2008 and 31.12.2015, respectively, on attaining the age of superannuation. In the present petition, they are claiming the benefit of one annual increment each for the service rendered by them during the 12 months preceding the dates of their respective retirements, which increment was due to them on 01.01.2009 and 01.01.2016, Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes respectively. The reliefs prayed for by the petitioners read as under:–
“A. That a Writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or directions may kindly be issued quashing the impugned communication/ rejection order dated 18.07.2024 (Annexure P-5) being patently illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional.
B. That the Writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or directions may kindly be issued directing the Respondents to grant the annual increment due to the Petitioner No-1 on 01.01.2009, and to the Petitioner No-2 on 01.01.20
Employees are entitled to annual increments earned prior to retirement, which must be considered for pension calculations as per Supreme Court directives.
An employee is entitled to an annual increment earned prior to retirement for pension calculations, as established by recent Supreme Court rulings.
An employee is entitled to an annual increment earned on the last date of service, impacting pension calculations.
Employees are entitled to notional increments earned prior to retirement for pension calculations, as established by the Supreme Court.
Employees are entitled to annual increments earned prior to retirement, as established by the Supreme Court, affecting pension calculations.
An employee is entitled to an annual increment earned prior to retirement, as clarified by the Supreme Court.
Employees are entitled to annual increments earned prior to retirement for pension calculations, as clarified by the Supreme Court.
An employee is entitled to the annual increment earned on the last date of service, as established by the Supreme Court.
Employees are entitled to annual increments earned during the last year of service, even if they retire before the increment date, as established by Supreme Court precedent.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
