Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KAINTHLA
Hira Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
The petitioner has filed the present petition for quashing of F.I.R. 0034 of 2022 dated 19.11.2022, registered for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) at Police Station Udaipur, District Lahaul & Spiti, H.P. (The parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they are arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience)
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the informant made a complaint to the police, asserting that the accused is an illiterate person and had supplied fake certificates at the time of his recruitment to the Indian Army. He served in the Indian Army based on such fake certificates. He cheated the government with these forged certificates. The police registered the F.I.R., conducted the investigation and filed a charge sheet before the learned Trial Court after completion of the investigation.
3. Being aggrieved by the registration of F.I.R. and filing of the charge-sheet, the petitioner has filed the present petition for quashing of the F.I.R. and consequent charge-sheet. It was asserted that the petitioner was recru
The court held that an FIR cannot be quashed if it discloses cognizable offences, and allegations of mala fide do not suffice for quashing proceedings.
The court upheld the FIR against the petitioner, ruling that sufficient allegations existed to constitute cognizable offences, and the truth of these allegations could not be evaluated at the quashin....
The court cannot assess the truthfulness of allegations in an FIR at the quashing stage; it must determine if the FIR discloses a prima facie case for proceeding.
The court held that allegations in the FIR disclosed a prima facie case under Section 170 IPC, and quashing was not warranted at this stage.
An FIR cannot be quashed if the allegations, taken at face value, indicate the commission of cognizable offences, and the court cannot assess their truthfulness at this stage.
The court ruled that an FIR can only be quashed if the allegations do not constitute a cognizable offence, and the truthfulness of the allegations cannot be determined at the quashing stage.
The court held that allegations in the FIR constituted a cognizable offence, and the petition for quashing the FIR was dismissed.
The court held that specific allegations of assault and trespass in the FIR constituted cognizable offences, thus not warranting quashing.
The court held that allegations arising from a civil dispute cannot constitute a criminal offence, and continuation of such proceedings amounts to an abuse of the legal process.
The court held that allegations in the FIR constituted cognizable offences, including voyeurism and assault, and dismissed the petition to quash the FIR.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
