Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH
Aayush Ranout – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
Petitioner has filed the present petition, under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’), for quashing of FIR No.127/2024, dated 02.12.2024 (hereinafter referred to as the FIR, in question), registered with Police Station Barsar, District Hamirpur, H.P., under Sections 281 and 125(b) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘BNS’), as well as, the proceedings resultant thereto, which are stated to be pending before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Barsar, District Hamirpur, H.P. (hereinafter referred to as the ‘trial Court’).
2. The relief of quashing has been sought on the basis of the compromise, effected between the petitioner and respondent No.2, who is injured, in the accident. Petitioner has also impleaded complainant as respondent No.3, in the present case.
3. As per the case, set up by the petitioner, on the complaint, made by respondent No.3 to the police, FIR in question has been registered against him.
3.1. According to the petitioner, complainant is having stationary shop near Government College, Barsar and on 02.12.2024, she was sitting on b
The court held that a genuine compromise between the parties, supported by witness testimonies, can justify quashing an FIR and related proceedings.
A compromise between the parties in a criminal case can lead to quashing of FIR when the complainant exonerates the accused, indicating minimal chances of successful prosecution.
A compromise between the parties can lead to quashing of FIR when the complainant exonerates the accused, indicating weak prosecution chances.
A valid compromise between parties can lead to quashing of FIR in criminal cases, especially when key witnesses exonerate the accused.
A compromise between parties can lead to the quashing of an FIR when the complainant exonerates the accused, indicating a lack of prosecution's success.
The court quashed the FIR based on a compromise where the complainant exonerated the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of maintaining societal harmony.
A compromise between the parties can lead to the quashing of an FIR when the complainant withdraws allegations, indicating that prosecution would not succeed.
A compromise between parties in a criminal case can lead to quashing of FIR when there's no negligence and maintaining peace is prioritized.
Compromise between parties in vehicular offences can lead to quashing of FIR when no negligence is established, promoting societal peace and judicial efficiency.
Compromise between parties in a criminal case can lead to quashing of FIR and proceedings to prevent abuse of legal process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
