JUDGMENT :

Rakesh Kainthla, J.

The petitioner has filed the present petition for seeking regular bail. It has been asserted that the petitioner was arrested for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 20, 25 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act vide F.I.R. No. 233 of 2024 dated 19.10.2024 at Police Station Nurpur, District Kangra, H.P. As per the prosecution, police recovered 3.575 Kgs of charas from a vehicle bearing registration No. TO424CH6911A on 18.10.2024. The police arrested Bhupinder Thakur-driver and occupant Jitender Thakur. The police seized the charas and sent it to the FSL. The police interrogated Bhupinder Thakur, who disclosed that Desh Raj, the present petitioner, had handed over charas to him on 18.10.2024 with a direction to deliver it to Sonu at Pathankot. The police arrested the petitioner. There is no evidence against the petitioner except the statement made by the co-accused. The petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents. He is ready and willing to furnish sureties to the satisfaction of the Court and abide by all the terms and conditions which the Court may impose; hence, the petition.

2. The petition is opposed by filing a status report asserting that the police were on patrolling duty on 18.10.2024. They received a secret information at 12:30 am that a vehicle was transporting a huge quantity of charas, and in case of its search, police could recover charas. The police reduced the information to writing and sent it to the Supervisory Officer. The police went to 24 miles near Jonta and found that a car bearing registration No. TO424CH6911A was parked on the road. The police checked the car in the presence of Mahinder Singh Up Pradhan. The driver revealed his name as Bhupinder Thakur, and the person sitting beside the driver revealed his name as Jitender Thakur. The police recovered 7 packets containing black sticks wrapped in transparent polythene. The police checked the sticks and found them to be charas. The police weighed the packets and found their weight to be 3.575 kgs. The police seized the charas and arrested the occupant of the vehicle. As per the report of analysis, the exhibit was an extract of cannabis and a sample of charas. Bhupinder Thakur revealed during the interrogation that Desh Raj, the present petitioner, had handed over the charas to him on Katola Batheri road with a direction to deliver it to Sonu. The police are searching for Sonu; hence, the status report.

3. I have heard Mr. Vijender Katoch, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, learned Additional Advocate General for the respondent/State.

4. Mr. Vijender Katoch, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated. There is no evidence against the petitioner except the statement made by the co-accused, which is not legally admissible; therefore, he prayed that the present petition be allowed and the petitioner be released on bail.

5. Mr. Lokender Kutlehria, learned Additional Advocate General, for the respondent/State, submitted that the main accused was found in possession of a commercial quantity of charas and the rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act apply to the present case. The petitioner is unable to satisfy the twin conditions laid down under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, and he is not entitled to bail; hence, he prayed that the present petition be dismissed.

6. I have given considerable thought to the submissions made at the bar and have gone through the records carefully.

7. The parameters for granting bail were considered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ajwar v. Waseem (2024) 10 SCC 768: 2024 SCC OnLine SC 974, wherein it was observed at page 783: -

“Relevant parameters for granting bail

26. While considering whether bail ought to be granted in a matter involving a serious criminal offence, the Court must consider relevant factors like the nature of the accusations made against the accused, the man